Today we bring you two submissions on reports of Eugene passing the Turing Test:
Yet another notch in the belt for bad science reporting.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/computer-becomes-first-to-pass-turing-test-in-artificial-intelligence-milestone-but-academics-warn-of-dangerous-future-9508370.html
The singularity is here! jk, lol! While what has happened is an amazing accomplishment and I'm stoked... It doesn't count as a complete passing of the Turing test in my book. This program was written to pass the test, not as a general purpose 'thinking' machine that can pass it. Again, hats off to these guys, but media outlets reporting it as true AI (conjuring images of Data, Rommy, Hal, Sonny, etc.) doesn't seem right.
The 65 year-old iconic Turing Test was passed for the very first time by supercomputer Eugene Goostman during Turing Test 2014 held at the renowned Royal Society in London on Saturday.
'Eugene', a computer programme that simulates a 13 year old boy, was developed in Saint Petersburg, Russia. The development team includes Eugene's creator Vladimir Veselov, who was born in Russia and now lives in the United States, and Ukrainian born Eugene Demchenko who now lives in Russia.http://www.reading.ac.uk/news-and-events/releases/PR583836.aspx
Other reports can be found at Ars Technica, Phys.org, and The Huffington Post.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 09 2014, @03:43PM
Perhaps the first step in making these bots make sense when confronted with a human is to ensure that they can have a decent and coherent conversation among themselves first. Apparently no one ever gave that any thought. Can a bot pass the Turing test if talking to another Bot by fooling a third person observer that these are two humans conversing? Shouldn't be that hard to do since all you would have to do is record a natural conversation between two people and program the bots to respond to each other as such.