Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday June 09 2014, @07:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the a-rising-tide-lifts-all-boats-but-not-so-good-for-property dept.

Michael Mishak writes that there are few places in the nation more vulnerable to rising sea levels than low-lying South Florida, a tourist and retirement mecca built on drained swampland. Yet as other coastal states and the Obama administration take aggressive measures to battle the effects of global warming, Florida's top Republican politicians are challenging the science and balking at government fixes. In Miami Beach the concern is palpable. On a recent afternoon, local businessman Scott McKenzie pulled out his iPad and flipped through photos from a 2009 storm. In one, two women kayak through knee-high water in the center of town. "This is not a future problem. It's a current problem," says Leonard Berry, a contributing author of the National Climate Assessment, which found that sea levels have risen about 8 inches in the past century. By one regional assessment, the waters off South Florida could rise another 2 feet by 2060, a scenario that would overwhelm the region's aging drainage system and taint its sources of drinking water. "It's getting to the point where some properties being bought today will probably not be able to be sold at the end of a 30-year mortgage," says Harold Wanless. "You would think responsible leaders and responsible governments would take that as a wake-up call."

Gov. Rick Scott, who is running for re-election, has worked with the Republican-controlled Legislature to dismantle Florida's fledgling climate change initiatives that were put into place by his predecessor and current opponent, Democrat Charlie Crist. "I'm not a scientist," says Scott when asked about anthropogenic global warming during a stop in Miami. Meanwhile, Miami Beach is bracing for another season of punishing tides. "We're suffering while everyone is arguing man-made or natural," says Christine Florez, president of the West Avenue Corridor Neighborhood Association. "We should be working together to find solutions so people don't feel like they've been left on a log drifting out to sea."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by zsau on Monday June 16 2014, @10:40AM

    by zsau (2642) on Monday June 16 2014, @10:40AM (#55844)

    Well, I'd be inclined to call your prediction utopian (that is, the prediction that most people will have switched away from fossil fuels sometime in the forseeable future), but even if that were true it doesn't matter. It took millions of years to get that carbon out of the atmosphere. If we put them all back into the atmosphere on any scale less than millions of years, we're going to make it rather uncomfortable. It doesn't really matter if we use up all the fossil fuels in the next twenty years or the next century: they're both just as bad.

    (Btw, I hope I've interpreted your implied timescale right. Sorry if I haven't.)

  • (Score: 2) by khallow on Monday June 16 2014, @10:31PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 16 2014, @10:31PM (#56118) Journal

    It took millions of years to get that carbon out of the atmosphere

    There's no geological evidence for that. Even the more pessimistic interpretations of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum [wikipedia.org] had scenarios with far more carbon than is currently present in the atmosphere scrubbed inside of 100,000 years. Personally, I think it would be on the scale of thousands of years to remove the current elevated levels of carbon dioxide which is quite adequate IMHO.
     
     

    It doesn't really matter if we use up all the fossil fuels in the next twenty years or the next century: they're both just as bad.

    Which would also be orders of magnitude more than the amount of fossil fuels that we have or could economically extract.