Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday November 19 2017, @01:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the nothing-lasts-forever dept.

Zimbabwe awaits news on Mugabe's future

Zimbabweans are waiting to see what steps the military will take next after seizing control of the country. President Robert Mugabe is said to be under house arrest but the whereabouts of his wife Grace, who was bidding to succeed him as president, are unknown.

South African ministers have been in the capital Harare meeting the army and political parties. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) regional bloc will hold emergency talks on Thursday.

President Mugabe, 93, has been in control of Zimbabwe since it gained independence from Britain in 1980. But the power struggle over who might succeed him, between Mrs Mugabe and her rival former vice-president Emmerson Mnangagwa, has split the ruling Zanu-PF party in recent months.

More about Zimbabwe and former President Robert Mugabe.

Here is your emoji: 🇿🇼. Use it well.

CNN: Zimbabwe: Talks underway to form transitional government, source says
NYT editorial: For Zimbabwe, a Coup Isn't the Answer

Extras from BBC: Zimbabwe: Did Robert Mugabe finally go too far? - BBC News
Zimbabwe latest: How can you tell if a coup is happening?

Update: 'Mugabe Must Go': Thousands in Zimbabwe Rally Against Leader
Zimbabwe: Zanu-PF leaders meeting to decide Mugabe future
Pressure weighs on Mugabe to quit after mass protests

Update 2: Zanu-PF has removed Mugabe as party leader, and he may be impeached if he does not resign the Presidency by Monday.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 19 2017, @06:41PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 19 2017, @06:41PM (#598997)
    Well if you play that game the USA's head count is even higher than Mugabe's.

    The mess in Iraq is because the USA lied and "regime changed" Iraq (Saddam was the USA's dog, he actually asked the US ambassador about Kuwait and the ambassador screwed up, so Saddam bit Kuwait and the USA put him down later based on lies about their ex-pet dog).
    The mess in Libya is because the USA "successfully" regime changed it and replaced Gaddafi with muslim extremists.
    The mess in Syria is because the USA financed the Syrian opposition and then supplied arms to the rebellion.
    The USA isn't making things better in Yemen either.
    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 19 2017, @09:27PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 19 2017, @09:27PM (#599043)

    What's with this whataboutism? Can we just agree that all these governments are awful, to varying degrees?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 20 2017, @07:57AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 20 2017, @07:57AM (#599180)
      The difference is when Mugabe screws up his country the rest of us outside are fairly safe from the consequences.

      Not so if Trump decides to start Global Thermonuclear War because he happened to go full retard that day.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 20 2017, @01:53AM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 20 2017, @01:53AM (#599098) Journal

    Well if you play that game the USA's head count is even higher than Mugabe's.

    Unless of course, it's not. How are you making this apples to apples comparison between a country of 340 million and one of 16 million?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 20 2017, @04:32AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 20 2017, @04:32AM (#599147)

      Mugabe destroyed Zimbabwe but he didn't destroy as many OTHER countries as the USA did.

      Even when you divide by 20 the USA's wrongful kills count is higher:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change#Cold_War_era [wikipedia.org]
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_United_States#Covert_actions [wikipedia.org]

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 20 2017, @03:08PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 20 2017, @03:08PM (#599250) Journal
        Apples to apples comparison, remember? No point to counting wars involving US involvement (which let us note have yet to destroy a single country - changing leadership of a country is not its destruction) when you fail to count wars involving Zimbabwe involvement.

        We'll need to include Zimbabwe's interference [wikipedia.org] in the Second Congo War, particularly in providing the dominant air force in the war to the eventual victor, Joseph Kabila [wikipedia.org]. That war is thought to have killed 3 to almost 6 million people through mostly disease and starvation. With that multiplier of 20, things don't look so good for Zimbabwe anymore.

        I await your next round of whataboutism.