Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday November 30 2017, @09:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the whatever-will-they-do-with-the-one-billion-leftover-apples? dept.

From a Western Digital press release:

Western Digital Corp. (NASDAQ: WDC) announced today at the 7th RISC-V Workshop that the company intends to lead the industry transition toward open, purpose-built compute architectures. In his keynote address, Western Digital's Chief Technology Officer Martin Fink expressed the company's commitment to [...] transitioning its own consumption of processors – over one billion cores per year – to RISC-V.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by takyon on Thursday November 30 2017, @11:02AM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Thursday November 30 2017, @11:02AM (#603383) Journal
    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday November 30 2017, @12:58PM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday November 30 2017, @12:58PM (#603408)

      So, I'm lazy, but... assuming they are transitioning away from ARM? Watch this space: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/SFTBY?ltr=1 [yahoo.com] for a reaction to the news.

      --
      🌻🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 30 2017, @04:48PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 30 2017, @04:48PM (#603506)

      in the third link it said that nvidia will be moving to risk for their GPU microcontrollers. it's going to feel weird moving to all nvidia, assuming they helped more with nouveau...

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Wootery on Thursday November 30 2017, @12:02PM (12 children)

    by Wootery (2341) on Thursday November 30 2017, @12:02PM (#603396)

    Real industry adoption, by a major player, doing mission-critical work in their core products. Great stuff.

    Here's to a long and varied future of success for RISC-V. [Raises mug]

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by takyon on Thursday November 30 2017, @12:32PM (9 children)

      by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Thursday November 30 2017, @12:32PM (#603404) Journal

      Can we say "RISCY business"? "RISC-V business"?

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 30 2017, @01:38PM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 30 2017, @01:38PM (#603416)

        "RISQUE Business"?

        • (Score: 2) by Wootery on Thursday November 30 2017, @02:08PM (1 child)

          by Wootery (2341) on Thursday November 30 2017, @02:08PM (#603421)

          Eh? Is RISQUE an acronym?

          • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday November 30 2017, @03:44PM

            by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 30 2017, @03:44PM (#603469) Journal

            RISC-V Quality User Experience
            RISC-V Quality Useful Exceptional

            --
            Why do we need long double when a 64 bit double already represents all possible real numbers?
      • (Score: 2) by Wootery on Thursday November 30 2017, @02:10PM (5 children)

        by Wootery (2341) on Thursday November 30 2017, @02:10PM (#603423)

        Don't give them ideas - next thing we know we'll have a RISC management engine.

        • (Score: 4, Funny) by DannyB on Thursday November 30 2017, @03:46PM (3 children)

          by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 30 2017, @03:46PM (#603470) Journal

          Maybe we do already and we just don't know it. Or maybe that's what they want you to think. Or maybe Obama's birth certificate was signed using a weak cryptographic key. Or maybe the aliens are behind it.

          --
          Why do we need long double when a 64 bit double already represents all possible real numbers?
        • (Score: 2) by RamiK on Thursday November 30 2017, @08:48PM

          by RamiK (1813) on Thursday November 30 2017, @08:48PM (#603637)

          The sanctums proposal satisfies remote computing and DRM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3EN0_g6yL4 [youtube.com]

          There are recent attempts at formal verification: https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~rsinha/research/pubs/ccs2017.pdf [berkeley.edu]

          It's basically a cleaned up SGX that could allow a per-machine key to be issued by the silicon manufacturers as a CA. But the enclave is isolated and can't access anything the OS hasn't allocated it.

          The nice thing about this design is that, if you choose to, it will let you reject any enclave requests or just approve specific requests through the OS. While, at the same time, it has no persistent code running in the background that is outside your control as long as there aren't any enclaves running. This can also be verified easily by measuring power and/or thermal imaging the die while idling.

          --
          compiling...
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by driverless on Friday December 01 2017, @12:49AM (1 child)

      by driverless (4770) on Friday December 01 2017, @12:49AM (#603748)

      Real industry adoption, by a major player, doing mission-critical work in their core products. Great stuff.

      Real press release, by a major player currently renegotiating their Arm license. Commercially astute stuff.

      • (Score: 2) by Wootery on Friday December 01 2017, @10:34AM

        by Wootery (2341) on Friday December 01 2017, @10:34AM (#603850)

        Fair points, but did OpenRISC ever see this kind of success?

  • (Score: 2) by Rich on Thursday November 30 2017, @09:35PM

    by Rich (945) on Thursday November 30 2017, @09:35PM (#603664) Journal

    We can be happy every time such a libre solution scores a design win and gets a bit more entrenched.

    I'm wondering what strings have been pulled behind the scenes. I've been dabbling in the world of DLX-descendents, particularly with a bit of work on the Microblaze Linux port for a vertical market customer, and have been aware of the developments. (To those who haven't heard of DLX or Hennessy/Patterson-Architecture, it's kind of the idea seed for the MIPS like architectures, Microblaze, OpenRISC and now RISC-V).

    So there is already a libre contender in this area (OpenRISC), even being used commercially (Samsung). The RISC-V guys are late to the party. They pull an NIH (yeah, i've seen their arguments...), deliver something which looks a tad too seasoned for an academic project, and soon after score a 1bn/a units design win.

    It will be interesting to watch that space.

(1)