Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday December 02 2017, @01:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the see-what-we-did-there? dept.

https://www.cossacklabs.com/blog/macros-in-crypto-c-code.html

Like death and taxes, one thing that you can be sure of is that using C macros in a modern software project will cause a debate. While for some macros remain a convenient and efficient way of achieving particular programming goals, for others they are opaque, introduce the unnecessary risk of coding errors, and reduce readability.

The criticism of macros is particularly acute in the wider security community. Among Cossack Labs' engineers and the core Themis crypto library contributors there are people who previously worked on auditing cryptographic implementations of critical code. Their typical knee-jerk reaction to macros was always "kill it with fire and never use it again". Taking no sides, we would like to assess both pros and cons of using such dangerous things as macros in security code (as we faced the issue when developing Themis) and suggest some techniques for lowering the accompanying risks.

We'll also discuss a custom "for-audit" build target for Themis designed specifically to generate source code that exposes the macros to inspection because we appreciate the need for security software to be subject to detailed source code scrutiny.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Sunday December 03 2017, @03:29AM

    by Pino P (4721) on Sunday December 03 2017, @03:29AM (#604551) Journal

    You can get newbies in and out of a test sequence in just minutes; they'll never survive the most simple questions about language details. Better programmers will take longer to check out.

    It still costs quite a bit of money to administer the tests, especially when it involves flying in candidates from a thousand miles away. This competent testing had better provide improvement in quality that is measurable and substantial, or the shareholders won't stand for it.

    A fundamental (not basic) programmer skill is managing types. If the language doesn't do it, it's your job

    Then why not just write all programs in assembly language and make the programmer do everything?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2