Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Freeman on Thursday December 07 2017, @04:58PM (6 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Thursday December 07 2017, @04:58PM (#606865) Journal

    Firefox is the only independent major player. Their philosophy is much more along the lines of what I support than Microsoft, Google, or Apple. You can say, go Pale Moon! Which is great and I applaud their efforts, but they have their own issues as well. I've tried Pale Moon, but it never seemed to be any better than Firefox. I've tried Opera, but by the time I did; that ship had sailed. My work place's "offically supported browser" is Google Chrome. I'm guessing more to do with someone's bias and the fact that it's easier to develop for one Specific browser. Thankfully, they're not draconian in their enforcement of what exact software you may use. I work at an Academic Library, give me the tools, or let me get my own, so I can get stuff done.

    --
    "I said in my haste, All men are liars." Psalm 116:11
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Thursday December 07 2017, @07:51PM (1 child)

    by urza9814 (3954) on Thursday December 07 2017, @07:51PM (#606966) Journal

    My work's officially supported browser is also Chrome, and they don't give us admin rights to our laptops. So I use Firefox portable :)

    The only problem is once they discovered that I have it, the people I work with started constantly borrowing my laptop for *company sites* that won't load properly on IE/Chrome...because we're a company full of software developers who don't understand stuff like PortableApps apparently...all these fuckers care about is Football...

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 23 2017, @11:58PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 23 2017, @11:58PM (#613740)

      ...[who don't] understand stuff like PortableApps

      Sounds like an opportunity for some profit.
      Populate a bunch of empty thumbdrives. [quickturnflash.com]

      -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by tangomargarine on Friday December 08 2017, @06:34PM (2 children)

    by tangomargarine (667) on Friday December 08 2017, @06:34PM (#607331)

    I've tried Pale Moon, but it never seemed to be any better than Firefox

    Except that its UI isn't all fucked up? Which was the entire reason to start using Pale Moon in the first place?

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 10 2017, @02:27PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 10 2017, @02:27PM (#607997)

      Well, I remember finding Pale Moon as it originally was-- an optimized build of firefox for specific processors, from when Mozilla disallowed using their trademarks for modified versions. However, Moonchild's decision to fork over the UI overhaul is why most people, myself included, use it.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Freeman on Monday December 11 2017, @05:03PM

      by Freeman (732) on Monday December 11 2017, @05:03PM (#608328) Journal

      Maybe, I've just grown accustomed to having to adopt random UI changes, then. With the XP -> Vista -> 7 -> 10 changes, and all the Window Server iterations. Then there's all of the Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Puppy Linux, and Arch UI changes / reversions. I can even muddle my way around OSX, if given the need. Back to strictly browser UI changes, I did find it a bit annoying that they changed the history icon with the most recent version, but again I shall adapt. I would rather see things being refreshed, kept up-to-date, and thriving. Perhaps, Firefox needs these changes to stay relevant and continue adding new young users to the mix. Maybe, they're full of crazy, and they will eventually implode. Currently, I don't see the latter. In any case, to each their own, and I'm glad there can be a fork of Firefox.

      --
      "I said in my haste, All men are liars." Psalm 116:11
  • (Score: 2) by meustrus on Friday December 29, @06:29PM

    by meustrus (4961) <meustrusNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Friday December 29, @06:29PM (#615591)

    Chrome gets to be the "officially supported browser" because of the cross-platform administrative tools they offer. It's even better at Windows group policy than IE. Not to mention being waaay more safe and secure than anything else they could lock down (which is pretty much just IE).

    One could say that generally, Google is doing the Microsoft thing these days but without shooting themselves in the foot every god damned minute.

    --
    If there isn't at least one reference or primary source, it's not +1 Informative. Maybe the underused +1 Interesting?