Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Wednesday June 11 2014, @03:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-for-profit dept.

Tim Hornyak reports that National Science Foundation (NSF) has banned a researcher for using supercomputer resources to generate bitcoin. According to the semiannual report to Congress by the NSF Office of Inspector General, the computationally intensive mining used about $150,000 worth of NSF-supported computer use at the two universities to generate bitcoins worth about $8,000 to $10,000 (PDF). The universities told the NSF that the work was unauthorized, reporting that the researcher accessed the computers remotely, even using a mirror site in Europe, possibly to conceal his identity. "The researcher's access to all NSF-funded supercomputer resources was terminated," the office wrote. "In response to our recommendation, NSF suspended the researcher government-wide."

The incident follows a similar case in February in which a researcher at Harvard University was caught using supercomputer resources to mine dogecoin. The researcher was barred from accessing the computer resources.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Wednesday June 11 2014, @03:12PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Wednesday June 11 2014, @03:12PM (#54178)

    Here's what I know about government contracting:
    - I know that in my county government, the way it happened for years was that any would-be contractors had to first do work for free on the home of the county commissioner, and then would be awarded contracts without a whole lot of checking on whether any work was getting done. This was all determined in a court of law.

    - I know that in another area of my state, the Congressman got a large campaign contribution from a defense supplier in the area. Said Congressman then snuck into a bill a requirement that the US Army buy a lot of what said defense supplier was making, despite the fact that the army didn't want any more of what they were selling.

    - I know of at least one case where the RFP was carefully worded in such a way that only one company could possibly fulfill the requirements, and the person who worded the RFP in that way left government work for a very nice $300K a year job at that single company.

    So yeah, I'm not saying all government contracting is corrupt, but a lot of it is. I understand that there are safeguards and Inspectors General and the like, but I also understand that there are lots and lots of people doing everything they can to get around those safeguards, because there's just a huge enough pile of money available that corruption is inevitable.

    This isn't unique to government: Corporations that are large enough for executives to have significant departmental budgets and/or a purchasing department run into exactly the same sorts of problems, because it's so darn profitable for individuals to look the other way even if the corporation as a whole would get hurt by it.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2