Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday December 15 2017, @11:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the at-least-it's-in-the-air dept.

Has the People's Republic caught up?

The Chengdu J-20 marks the first entry of a multirole stealth fighter into China's armed forces. According to the Department of Defense (DOD), China views stealth technology as a core component in the transformation of its air force from "a predominantly territorial air force to one capable of conducting both offensive and defensive operations." Designed for enhanced stealth and maneuverability, the J-20 has the potential to provide China with a variety of previously unavailable air combat options and enhance its capability to project power.

As an advanced multirole stealth fighter, it is speculated that the J-20 can fulfill both air-to-air and air-to-ground combat roles for the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) and the aviation branch of the People's Liberation Army Navy (referred to as either Naval Aviation or the PLAN-AF). According to PLAAF Senior Colonel Shen Jinke, the J-20 will enhance the overall combat capability of China's air force. A 2016 report by the DOD states that the J-20 represents a critical step in China's efforts to develop "advanced aircraft to improve its regional power projection capabilities and to strengthen its ability to strike regional airbases and facilities." In 2014, the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission described the J-20 as "more advanced than any other fighter currently deployed by Asia Pacific countries."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 15 2017, @03:48PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 15 2017, @03:48PM (#610320)

    And unless they have a very good range they will be kinda out of luck once the defense takes out their support

    The offense you mean? They don't need good range or carriers for defense.

    Whereas the USA needs carrier groups for "defense" thousands of miles half way around the world... The USA is like someone many blocks away who plonks a sentry gun in your next-door neighbor's backyard for "defense". And accuses you of being hostile when you fly drones near that gun...

    Yeah China has been involved in "regime change" but not as much as the USA and mostly to _adjacent_ countries.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by JoeMerchant on Friday December 15 2017, @04:32PM (3 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday December 15 2017, @04:32PM (#610343)

    The US is no angel, I'm hard pressed to decide which was worse: Tibet or Hawaii. I lean toward Tibet because the heavy-duty atrocities were more recent.

    --
    John Galt is a selfish crybaby [huffpost.com].
    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 15 2017, @06:20PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 15 2017, @06:20PM (#610386)

      How about the USA "wonderful work" in Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria?

      See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Schneider#Assassination [wikipedia.org]

      • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Saturday December 16 2017, @02:23AM

        by JoeMerchant (3937) on Saturday December 16 2017, @02:23AM (#610596)

        Meh, those might be considered "Police" actions... not the greatest thing when you're on the receiving end, but at the end of the day the oppressors go home and you get to put the pieces back together. The Hawaiians, Native Americans and Tibetans are now occupied and slowly fading away.

        Also, I'd say the US in Vietnam and Korea, and the Russians in Afghanistan were far worse than the recent US Middle East / North Africa campaigns, just due to duration - although W did sink US in deeper than a wise man (like his father) would have in Iraq.

        It's all bad, but sometimes the "Police" actions can improve life in the aftermath, sometimes.

        --
        John Galt is a selfish crybaby [huffpost.com].
    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 15 2017, @06:22PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 15 2017, @06:22PM (#610387)

      The US is no angel

      Lot closer to devil: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change [wikipedia.org]

  • (Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Friday December 15 2017, @05:40PM

    by Aiwendil (531) on Friday December 15 2017, @05:40PM (#610369) Journal

    No, I mean defence. If you come in with stealth-planes and find all your nice little air-refuelling planes and AA-supression units having started new career as fireballs you are out of luck on surviving/completing the return - especially if you are the only radar-interfering object still in the air (that moves differently from clouds at that altitude)