SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the if-you-build-it-they-will-come dept.
Submitted via IRC for AndyTheAbsurd
After more than a decade of work, government researchers in the U.S. are ready to test an unusual birth control method for men—a topical gel that could prevent the production of sperm.
And no, gentlemen, you don't rub it on your genitals.
The clinical trial, which begins in April and will run for about four years, will be the largest effort in the U.S. to test a hormonal form of birth control for men.
[...] The new gel contains two synthetic hormones, progestin and testosterone. Progestin blocks the testes from making enough testosterone to produce normal levels of sperm. The replacement testosterone is needed to counteract the hormone imbalances the progestin causes but won't make the body produce sperm.
[...] The gel can suppress sperm levels for about 72 hours, so if men forget a dose, "there is a bit of forgiveness," says Régine Sitruk-Ware, distinguished scientist at the Population Council, a nonprofit for reproductive health that is sponsoring the trial alongside the NIH.
[...] Even if the trial is successful, Blithe says it will likely be several years before the gel would be available to the public.
Source: A Contraceptive Gel for Men Is About to Go on Trial (archive)
(Score: 2, Funny) by Runaway1956 on Thursday December 21 2017, @01:46PM (3 children)
A better choice of words would be "Men would like to be able to regulate their own virility." Women may or may not be fertile - men generally are not. The gender benders still haven't figured that one out.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 2) by Freeman on Thursday December 21 2017, @05:08PM (2 children)
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=17/11/06/0127241 [soylentnews.org] https://www.sciencealert.com/two-dad-babies-could-soon-be-a-reality [sciencealert.com] => 2 men could have a child *This hurts my brain* Ethical/Not Ethical? Weird? What if it's safer? Could we have Surrogate robots? Would that be better or worse than a "normal" Surrogacy? *Yep, brain still hurts*
Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday December 21 2017, @05:23PM
Yeah - even if they get things all worked out, they'll still be odd balls. Can't wait to see what kind of crazy wild complications they experience!
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday December 21 2017, @06:16PM
It would be interesting to see if artificial wombs are developed and proven to be *safer* than human wombs (when properly manufactured/etc.). Just look at this story:
How Racism May Cause Black Mothers To Suffer The Death Of Their Infants [npr.org]
Various, hard-to-quantify external factors like racism-induced stress could lead to premature birth. Miscarriage [wikipedia.org] has a huge list of potential risk factors. We could eliminate the uncertainty by using artificial wombs, and that could benefit women tremendously. But it also probably means that 2 Dads could have a genetic child (male or female) and bring it to term, without the involvement of a woman or possible legal ramifications of using a female surrogate (varies by country).
Suddenly, the "sacred feminine" is no longer sacred. It's industrialized. Like a factory that makes canned beans or yogurt. No more mystery, just a process.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]