Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Friday June 13 2014, @03:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the Injustice-for-All dept.

In 2009, a National Academy of Sciences committee embarked on a long-overdue quest to study typical forensics analyses with an appropriate level of scientific scrutiny--and the results were deeply chilling. Aside from DNA analysis, not a single forensic practice held up to rigorous inspection.

Far from an infallible science, forensics is a decades-long experiment in which undertrained lab workers jettison the scientific method in favor of speedy results that fit prosecutors' hunches. No one knows exactly how many people have been wrongly imprisoned--or executed--due to flawed forensics. But the number, most experts agree, is horrifyingly high. A complete overhaul of our evidence analysis is desperately needed.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 14 2014, @03:16AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 14 2014, @03:16AM (#55188)

    No, "climate change" is certainly an inarguable fact. The climate does change, nobody can deny that. The "issue" is whether or not humans can change the climate through geoengineering.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Saturday June 14 2014, @08:00AM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Saturday June 14 2014, @08:00AM (#55237) Journal

    The climate does change, nobody can deny that.

    Oh, of course you can deny it. (What do you mean, ice age? Every creationist can tell you there was no ice age because back then the earth didn't yet exist, and anyway, where does the bible talk about the ice age?)

    Whether it is rational to deny it is a different question, of course.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.