Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Friday June 13 2014, @03:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the Injustice-for-All dept.

In 2009, a National Academy of Sciences committee embarked on a long-overdue quest to study typical forensics analyses with an appropriate level of scientific scrutiny--and the results were deeply chilling. Aside from DNA analysis, not a single forensic practice held up to rigorous inspection.

Far from an infallible science, forensics is a decades-long experiment in which undertrained lab workers jettison the scientific method in favor of speedy results that fit prosecutors' hunches. No one knows exactly how many people have been wrongly imprisoned--or executed--due to flawed forensics. But the number, most experts agree, is horrifyingly high. A complete overhaul of our evidence analysis is desperately needed.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by linuxrocks123 on Saturday June 14 2014, @08:06AM

    by linuxrocks123 (2557) on Saturday June 14 2014, @08:06AM (#55239) Journal

    That's disturbing. I thought best practice in forensics cases was to bitcopy the drive while mounted read-only, store the original drive in an evidence locker, and do all forensics on the copy. What specific organizations are you aware of that do not use this standard?