Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday January 10 2018, @08:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the trust-us-we're-the-government dept.

The Washington Post has a story which says:

FBI Director Christopher A. Wray on Tuesday renewed a call for tech companies to help law enforcement officials gain access to encrypted smartphones, describing it as a "major public safety issue."

Wray said the bureau was unable to gain access to the content of 7,775 devices in fiscal 2017 — more than half of all the smartphones it tried to crack in that time period — despite having a warrant from a judge.

"Being unable to access nearly 7,800 devices in a single year is a major public safety issue," he said, taking up a theme that was a signature issue of his predecessor, James B. Comey.

Wray was then quoted as saying:

"We're not interested in the millions of devices of everyday citizens," he said in New York at Fordham University's International Conference on Cyber Security. "We're interested in those devices that have been used to plan or execute terrorist or criminal activities."

He then went on to promote the long-disparaged idea of key escrow:

As an example of a possible compromise, Wray cited a case from New York several years ago. Four major banks, he said, were using a chat messaging platform called Symphony, which was marketed as offering "guaranteed data deletion." State financial regulators became concerned that the chat platform would hamper investigations of Wall Street.

"In response," Wray said, "the four banks reached an agreement with the regulators to ensure responsible use" of Symphony. They agreed to keep a copy of their communications sent through the app for seven years and to store duplicate copies of their encryption keys with independent custodians not controlled by the banks, he said.

To me this is more of the utter nonsense the government has spouted. When will they understand that key escrow only works when one trusts the government and the keeper of the keys?

Previously:


Original Submission   Alternate Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday January 10 2018, @10:04AM (1 child)

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Wednesday January 10 2018, @10:04AM (#620415) Homepage
    Considering terroristic and criminal activity such as this brutal attack: https://www.dangerous.com/38692/bike-lock-antifa-professor-gets-his-first-lesson-in-justice-pretrial-date-set/ , I'd like to see him outlaw all bike locks. I fail to see what bit about that isn't to do with "public safety", so surely the same logic must apply?
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 10 2018, @07:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 10 2018, @07:58PM (#620598)

    method:

    Chain a few of them up to bike racks with the frames full of explosives and detonate. Done a few times and bicycles will be rendered illegal/regulated the same way pressure cookers were, leading to more people being accosted on bicycles with probable cause and as a result forcing more people to use public transportation, uber/lyft, or their own cars in place of physically driven modes of locomotion.

    Would make an interesting legal battle between the bicyclist assholes and the anti-freedom government assholes, plus result in a whole variety of new bikes without hollow frames, or requiring foamed and capped frames and fixed height seats to avoid future security concerns.