Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Saturday June 14 2014, @09:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the safer-in-the-bubble dept.

ZDNet have put out a story claiming that, although Apple's walled-garden approach is not popular with everybody, it does appear to have prevented almost all malware from becoming prevalent on iOS. From the article:

Everyone knows there's no iOS malware, right? Strictly speaking, there is. As a practical matter, there isn't. At least if you stick with the official Apple store, you are more likely to win Powerball than to be hit by iOS malware.

But to make that "strictly speaking" point, FortiGuard Labs's Axelle Apvrille ("the Crypto Girl") felt it necessary to list all the iOS malware on record all 11 instances, eight of which work only on jailbroken phones.

[....]

It's not like iOS isn't an inviting target. There are zillions of devices out there and iOS customers have shown that they are willing to spend money on apps. And there absolutely are ways that iPhones can be attacked, although more likely through vulnerabilities, especially in Safari, than through malicious apps.

In fact, Apple's rules for what it will allow in its App Store are so strict that they effectively ban security software. It's a good thing there is next to no malware, because what you would need to do to block it on your phone is not permitted. Android, on the other hand, has a burgeoning market for security software and no shortage of malware.

Do you agree with this assessment?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 14 2014, @03:09PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 14 2014, @03:09PM (#55309)
    Someone has missed the point behind analogies.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 14 2014, @04:44PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 14 2014, @04:44PM (#55335)

    North Korea is not an analogy for Apple. Someone has 'overreaction' and 'hyperbole' turned up to 11.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by HiThere on Saturday June 14 2014, @06:45PM

      by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 14 2014, @06:45PM (#55361) Journal

      Sorry, but it is *an* analogy to Apple. I.e., there is at least one way in which they are analogous. Singapore would have been an analogy with a closer fit along multiple axis, but wouldn't have had the emotional impact. Even then it's (currently) overstating the case.

      --
      Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
      • (Score: 2) by khchung on Sunday June 15 2014, @06:00AM

        by khchung (457) on Sunday June 15 2014, @06:00AM (#55510)

        Singapore would have been an analogy with a closer fit along multiple axis, but wouldn't have had the emotional impact.

        It HAS the emotional impact, just not the one desired by Apple-haters.

        If an Android user who has been to Singapore read about this analogy, they might actually decide to switch to iPhone, and we can't have that.

  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Saturday June 14 2014, @07:20PM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 14 2014, @07:20PM (#55373)
    Yeah and he forgot to log in, too.
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈