SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
ZDNet have put out a story claiming that, although Apple's walled-garden approach is not popular with everybody, it does appear to have prevented almost all malware from becoming prevalent on iOS. From the article:
Everyone knows there's no iOS malware, right? Strictly speaking, there is. As a practical matter, there isn't. At least if you stick with the official Apple store, you are more likely to win Powerball than to be hit by iOS malware.
But to make that "strictly speaking" point, FortiGuard Labs's Axelle Apvrille ("the Crypto Girl") felt it necessary to list all the iOS malware on record all 11 instances, eight of which work only on jailbroken phones.
[....]
It's not like iOS isn't an inviting target. There are zillions of devices out there and iOS customers have shown that they are willing to spend money on apps. And there absolutely are ways that iPhones can be attacked, although more likely through vulnerabilities, especially in Safari, than through malicious apps.
In fact, Apple's rules for what it will allow in its App Store are so strict that they effectively ban security software. It's a good thing there is next to no malware, because what you would need to do to block it on your phone is not permitted. Android, on the other hand, has a burgeoning market for security software and no shortage of malware.
Do you agree with this assessment?
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Tork on Saturday June 14 2014, @07:04PM
🏳️🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️🌈
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 14 2014, @08:19PM
Windows[...]more fully open
That's how I've always seen it--in the sense of open *wounds*. [google.com]
A big problem with that ecosystem has always been that its users see the band-aids pasted all over its open wounds as armor.
I really liked the name they gave to that release of Ubuntu which translated as armor-plated bug eater. [blogspot.com]
That seemed especially apt for folks migrating from Redmond's stuff.
-- gewg_
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 15 2014, @12:49AM
Yes, Windows is perhaps so open that its brains fall out. If we go by analogies with countries, perhaps Windows would be like Somalia (absolute anarchy leading to chaos), GNU/Linux like perhaps one of the Scandinavian countries (perhaps Finland where it was born, reasonable levels of control), Android/Linux perhaps like the United States (Google, like the NSA, is always watching you), and iOS like maybe Singapore (nanny state with a lot of irritating arbitrary rules). I don't know what an OS with policies analogous to China, the old Soviet Union, or North Korea would be like. Perhaps one of those absolute lock-down systems that supposedly exist to process highly classified data.
(Score: 2) by bugamn on Sunday June 15 2014, @01:58AM
But you can install malware on Linux, just like on Windows. It just isn't a bigger target as it isn't as widely used.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 15 2014, @02:41AM
Nonsense. What blackhat wouldn't want a botnet of ten thousand powerful Linux servers which sit in professional data centres and have big fat dedicated links connected to them? Each one of those is probably worth at least ten Windows PCs sitting in someone's living room with pathetic DSL connections in a DDoS attack. The difference is for the most part these Linux servers are run by competent admins who know and care about what they are doing, and are supported by an OS that helps rather than hinders them in their attempts to secure their systems. These people understand that they aren't supposed to run any binary sent to them by some joker on the Internet, and in case they don't, the OS does nothing to help them in their stupidity, as Windows seems ever apt to do.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Sunday June 15 2014, @03:52AM
I don't know if you realize how profound this statement is, but not in the way you intended it. Having the tools available is no good if the person at the keyboard isn't interested in using it. The device is in the hands of millions. You've just illustrated the value the "Walled Garden", that everybody likes to bitch about, is bringing to the security part of the equation. Your smart phone is one of the most personal things you could have in your possession. It has the photos you've taken, the contacts of your associations, a direct link into your communications services/social networking, and it has the ability to easily run up bills on your account. Do you want to be vigilant to keep it 'secure', or do you want it to be as dumb-proof as possible?
That's not a question intended to only receive one answer. There are very good reasons you could answer either way, I'm not judging you for choosing either. Me personally? I've chosen the pretend-I'm-dumb path. My phone is an iPhone, it's value is that it is as appliance-like as possible. I cannot install MAME on it, but at the same time I'm not too worried about getting malware from the App Store. I have an Android tablet I use for the tinkering stuff I like to do. If I render it unusable or it goes rogue on me, no biggie. I just don't want to combine tinkering with sensitive-to-my-personal life.
Thank you for bringing up exactly the reason the Walled Garden has value.
🏳️🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️🌈