SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
posted by
martyb
on Saturday January 27 2018, @12:43PM
from the I-got-mine!-And-Yours.-And-Yours.-Annnnnd-yours,-too. dept.
from the I-got-mine!-And-Yours.-And-Yours.-Annnnnd-yours,-too. dept.
The 1% grabbed 82% of all wealth created in 2017
More than $8 of every $10 of wealth created last year went to the richest 1%.
That's according to a new report from Oxfam International, which estimates that the bottom 50% of the world's population saw no increase in wealth.
Oxfam says the trend shows that the global economy is skewed in favor of the rich, rewarding wealth instead of work.
"The billionaire boom is not a sign of a thriving economy but a symptom of a failing economic system," said Winnie Byanyima, executive director of Oxfam International.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Only 1% of World's Population Grabbed 82% of all 2017 Wealth
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 261 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
squatcho, n.:
The button at the top of a baseball cap.
-- "Sniglets", Rich Hall & Friends
(Score: 2) by fritsd on Saturday January 27 2018, @05:39PM (2 children)
Wow.. are you really saying, that it is immoral, to be forced to do work for another man's benefit?
That's quite a radical viewpoint. It must be difficult for you to live in a society with other people, some of them putting unreasonable demands on you (or trying).
However, I respect that you'd never take a job where an asshole boss bullies you around :-). Wish I had done that a bit more often.
What is your viewpoint on military conscription: should it be dodged, because it is immoral to force you to fight for the protection of your countrymen?
And what about work in the public sector: nurses, teachers, firefighters, police officers have no choice but to work for others' benefit, even if sometimes they must "serve" absolute assholes.
What I mean is: sure, they get paid to interact with "people", but they must occasionally some days get people that they think: "It isn't worth the wage to have to deal with *these* people".
(Score: 1) by tftp on Saturday January 27 2018, @06:56PM
It's the basis of a free society. In ancient Rome it was perfectly moral.
Even if he does, I'm not forced to work for him. I do it voluntarily or I leave.
In a war morality changes. Try to proudly say in a crowd: "I'm a deserter, I do not want to protect you." See what happens.
They said an oath to help everyone. Yes, sometimes it's too hard. Those leave the profession. Nobody forces them to stay or to go.
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday January 27 2018, @07:07PM
Fuck yes I am. All week long and twice on Sunday. When I take a job it is for my benefit. You can tell by how I quit when value_returned is less than value_put_forth.
I'm against military conscription but not for moral reasons. I wouldn't, as a vet myself, want to share a foxhole with someone who did not want to be there. You couldn't trust them like you could a volunteer. For me that outweighs any moral argument one way or the other.
They're all paid except for volunteer firefighters. Almost none of them would be doing the job if they weren't. Actual volunteers, most of them will be doing the job because they enjoy the work, the company of their coworkers, the results of their effort, or a combination of the above. Actual altruists are mentally disturbed.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.