Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday June 16 2014, @12:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the a-big-problem dept.

Employers in Europe may soon have a duty to create reserved car parking spaces for obese staff, or adjust the office furniture for them as BBC reports that the European Court of Justice is considering a test case of a male nanny who says he was fired for being too fat - a ruling that could oblige employers to treat obesity as a disability. Employment expert Audrey Williams says the judges would have to decide "whether obesity itself should trigger preferential rights, or should only impact where an individual, due to obesity, has other recognized medical issues. Employers would have a duty to make reasonable adjustments to the workplace or working arrangements," says Williams. "This might include a review of where the employee is located and their seating arrangements, or even preferential access to car parking."

The US Equal Opportunity Commission already defines obesity as being a disability, under the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act. In a recent case involving morbid obesity, a Texan employee who weighed more than 680 pounds received $55,000 in compensation for being dismissed. In October 2009, the man was told to report to human resources where officials told him the company had reached the conclusion he could no longer "perform his job duties because of his weight and he was therefore terminated," the suit said. Ronald Kratz, who had gotten two promotions and high performance ratings over his 16-year-career, insists his weight did not interfere with his ability to perform his job duties as a parts sorter. Kratz, who lost over three hundred pounds since he was fired, has not been able to find another job despite sending out numerous applications, and his unemployment benefits have run out. "It has been really hard on the family."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by opinionated_science on Monday June 16 2014, @06:07PM

    by opinionated_science (4031) on Monday June 16 2014, @06:07PM (#56031)

    Yes.
    weight of food != weight gained. Water is a major component of our bodies. Exhalation is not the only way to lose mass. You also excrete cellular matter and other waste via bile salt aggregation. The microbial cultures also get their cut.

    But when it comes to excess fat, the *minimum* energy you will expend can be measured using CO2 metabolic calibration. The "overweight" label is perhaps not specific enough, which is why obesity is used.

    A pound of fat ~= 3500 kCals. That means you can extract maxiumum of 3500 kCals - that is biochemistry.

    However, not everyone will get 3500 kCals, but the government nutrition advice gives a made up number that is probably only applicable for 10% of the population. Perhaps the population needs to get an objective metabolism measurement every year? Probably a lot cheaper than the costs of managing all the other diseases.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2