Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday February 03 2018, @06:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the cutting-edge dept.

These Tools Upend Our View of Stone-Age Humans in Asia

Long ago in what's now southern India, early humans showed a knack for disruption that would've made Silicon Valley tech wizards envious. Over time, the ancient innovators rejected bulky hand-axes and cleavers, instead opting for sleek flakes of stone meant for cutting and tipping spears.

Similar disruptions occurred in Africa among the forebears of modern humans around the same time. But the timing of the Indian transition, spotted in the soil layers of a site called Attirampakkam, is eye-popping. At 250,000 years old—and possibly up to 385,000 years old—this tool transition occurred far earlier than it did at other sites in India.

The discovery, described in Nature on Wednesday [DOI: 10.1038/nature25444] [DX], pushes back the start of what's called the Middle Paleolithic culture in the region by more than a hundred thousand years. That, in turn, could reshape how scientists view the global spread of hominins—humans and their ancient relatives—before modern humans migrated out of Africa some 60,000 years ago.

Also at The Verge.

Related: Earliest Human Remains Outside of Africa Discovered


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by tftp on Sunday February 04 2018, @10:08PM

    by tftp (806) on Sunday February 04 2018, @10:08PM (#633038) Homepage
    Many materials that we use for cutters are ceramics. They don't rust, don't decay and will survive for a very long time. Those should have been found. Ask yourself a question: why would a civilization like ours today build all those huge structures? For what purpose? The existing megastructures do not look useful to a techno civ. The leftovers of the Baalbeck site indicate that the building was constructed inefficiently, that's why it fell apart in an earthquake. Those are contradictions. We can definitely claim that those walls and foundations were built by invaders from space (since they left no trace of their existence) but this still doesn't quite answer what they are good for. Why would extraterrestrials build temples for talking monkeys?