Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by mrpg on Monday February 05 2018, @07:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the sugoi-ze! dept.

Souped-up sounding rocket lifts off from Japan with tiny satellite

A modified sounding rocket originally designed to loft science instruments on high-altitude suborbital arcs blasted off Saturday from the Uchinoura Space Center in southern Japan and soared into orbit to become the world's smallest satellite launcher.

[...] Standing just 31 feet (9.5 meters) tall and spanning around 20 inches (52 centimeters) in diameter, the SS-520-5 rocket was modest by launcher standards. With Saturday's successful flight, the solid-fueled booster became the smallest rocket to ever put an object in orbit around Earth.

A student-built shoebox-sized CubeSat named TRICOM 1R — weighing in at about 10 pounds (3 kilograms) — was mounted on top of the SS-520-5 rocket for liftoff from the Uchinoura Space Center in Japan's Kagoshima prefecture.

[...] The SS-520 is designed to propel more than 300 pounds (140 kilograms) of science research instrumentation to an altitude of nearly 500 miles (800 kilometers) for a few minutes of exposure to space before falling back to Earth. Engineers added a third stage on top of the basic SS-520 booster to give it the capability to reach orbital speeds of more than 17,000 mph (27,000 kilometers per hour).

Also at The Verge.

Related: Rocket Lab's Second "Electron" Rocket Launch Succeeds, Reaches Orbit


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Monday February 05 2018, @07:09AM (4 children)

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Monday February 05 2018, @07:09AM (#633175) Homepage Journal

    - missile.

    I don't recall what that kind of missile was but it had to be small enough to have fit under the deck of a ship while standing vertically.

    The cover story was that the wayward satellite's hydrazine would be quite dangerously toxic should it survive reentry. I never believed that, not even a little bit.

    Not long before that the PRC shot down one of its own satellites. Without a doubt the US shot down that satellite to convey a diplomatic message.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by aim on Monday February 05 2018, @09:04AM

      by aim (6322) on Monday February 05 2018, @09:04AM (#633206)

      You want to look up ASAT [wikipedia.org], and specifically the ASM-135 [wikipedia.org] missile. You were thinking of the RIM-161 [wikipedia.org].

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by khallow on Monday February 05 2018, @05:28PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 05 2018, @05:28PM (#633341) Journal
      It was a suborbital missile. One doesn't need to achieve LEO (low Earth orbit) in order to wreck things in LEO.
    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Monday February 05 2018, @06:07PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Monday February 05 2018, @06:07PM (#633360)

      > Not long before that the PRC shot down one of its own satellites. Without a doubt the US shot down that satellite to convey a diplomatic message.

      The rest of the world was very happy when the dick-measuring contest stopped after those two samples.
      "Before you to the Moon and Mars" targets are a lot less disruptive to actually useful LEO sats.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by darkfeline on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:12AM

      by darkfeline (1030) on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:12AM (#633660) Homepage

      Getting to "orbit" "height" is much easier than getting to orbit speed.

      It's quite trivial to get something to "orbit" "height".

      Obligatory xkcd What If? https://what-if.xkcd.com/58/ [xkcd.com]

      --
      Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday February 05 2018, @07:20AM (1 child)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 05 2018, @07:20AM (#633185) Journal

    Can I buy such a rocket from a toy store?
    (actually I wonder what the cost for the launch may be? How does it compare with launching heaps of nanosats from a heavy rocket?)

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 05 2018, @10:59AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 05 2018, @10:59AM (#633228)

      Nanosats... ouch... just the ticket for someone who wants to take out satellites... just steer a nanosat into its path.

  • (Score: 1) by mmlj4 on Monday February 05 2018, @12:39PM (1 child)

    by mmlj4 (5451) on Monday February 05 2018, @12:39PM (#633255) Homepage

    "A student-built shoebox-sized CubeSat named TRICOM 1R — weighing in at about 10 pounds (3 kilograms)". Apparently a Japanese kilogram is 3.3 pounds? Good to know. I wonder if I can figure out how to short-sell and make a bundle.

    --
    Need a Linux consultant [joeykelly.net] in New Orleans?
    • (Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Monday February 05 2018, @02:22PM

      by Aiwendil (531) on Monday February 05 2018, @02:22PM (#633277) Journal

      That conversion makes sense if the reporter (or whoever made the conversion) used a well-versed conversion system, a libra (lb) (the original pound) is about 329g which would make it (3 / 0.329) ~ 9.11 pound, and then add some agressive rounding away from zero...

(1)