Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Thursday February 08 2018, @05:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the we'll-do-what-we-want-or-not dept.

Days ago, South Korean authorities announced that they'd capture any drone that got too close to Olympics event facilities. If you have a DJI-made craft, you won't even be able to get close. The UAV maker is releasing a software patch that creates a no-fly zone around Olympic areas.

For the duration of the games, DJI drones won't be able to fly through areas in the South Korean cities of Pyeongchang, Gangneung, Bongpyeong and Jeongseon.

"Safety is DJI's top priority and we've always taken proactive steps to educate our customers to operate within the law and where appropriate, implement temporary no-fly zones during major events," the company said in a statement, according to TechCrunch. "We believe this feature will reduce the potential for drone operations that could inadvertently create safety or security concerns."

Source: Engadget

Related: DJI introduced new software to stop its drones from flying in restricted airspace.
DJI Will Ground Drones If They Don't Apply a Software Update


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by frojack on Thursday February 08 2018, @09:03PM (3 children)

    by frojack (1554) on Thursday February 08 2018, @09:03PM (#635196) Journal

    I know people who have this drone, and they stopped updating the software before the version that made it mandatory to do so.

    They live with a few bugs, but absence of restrictions make it worth their while.

    This is what autonomous cars will bring to all of us. You want to attend a political rally for the other party? Sorry, you can't get there from where you are.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by insanumingenium on Thursday February 08 2018, @09:13PM (2 children)

    by insanumingenium (4824) on Thursday February 08 2018, @09:13PM (#635203) Journal

    That is a hell of a slippery slope you found there...

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by frojack on Friday February 09 2018, @01:11AM

      by frojack (1554) on Friday February 09 2018, @01:11AM (#635331) Journal

      There's a very good chance I will be right, (for some shades of right) long before sele driving cars are common.

      I can't imagine a better bomb deliver vehicle than a self driving car that can be summoned or sent, with nobody in it, or maybe just some random drugged stooge.

      There is a roving no fly zone around the president, they scramble fighter jets [seattlepi.com] for puddle jumper airplanes that wander by.

      You seriously think AVs are going to be overlooked?

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Friday February 09 2018, @01:30AM

      by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Friday February 09 2018, @01:30AM (#635337)

      It is a hell of a slippery slope, though I don't know that it will manifest in that exact form. Given the tendency of governments and corporations to abuse average people, of course autonomous cars will made made to abuse their users. Expect proprietary software, spying, digital restrictions management, and a general loss of control over your own vehicle. Autonomous cars seem like a good idea, but they will be ruined by greed, just like so many other things are.