Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday February 10 2018, @08:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the maybe-Y-will-be-better dept.

Chris Siebenmann over on his personal web page at the University of Toronto writes about X networking. He points out two main shortcomings preventing realization of the original vision of network transparancy. One is network speed and latency. The other is a too narrow scope for X's communication facilities.

X's network transparency was not designed as 'it will run xterm well'; originally it was to be something that should let you run almost everything remotely, providing a full environment. Even apart from the practical issues covered in Daniel Stone's slide presentation [warning for PDF], it's clear that it's been years since X could deliver a real first class environment over the network. You cannot operate with X over the network in the same way that you do locally. Trying to do so is painful and involves many things that either don't work at all or perform so badly that you don't want to use them.

Remote display protocols remain useful, but it's time to admit another way will have to be found. What's the latest word on Wayland or Mir?

Source : X's network transparency has wound up mostly being a failure


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by KiloByte on Saturday February 10 2018, @09:25AM (3 children)

    by KiloByte (375) on Saturday February 10 2018, @09:25AM (#635949)

    This. X works fine for me, including network transparency. Wayland does not.

    --
    Ceterum censeo systemd esse delendam.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by frojack on Saturday February 10 2018, @06:56PM (2 children)

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday February 10 2018, @06:56PM (#636100) Journal

    Is network transparency even planned for Wayland? (Honest question, because I don't know).

    Wayland devs have already admitted they are no better than X at security, and won't let you run root Graphical apps as joe user.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 11 2018, @01:01AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 11 2018, @01:01AM (#636192)

      Wayland is going to use Microsoft RDP. Rough quote from a wayland dev about using RDP was, "...a case where worse is better."

      For the very rare case that I need to use a remote gui application, X forwarding has worked fine for me.

      Some of what I have read about wayland worries me that we are in store for systemd experience redux-- e.g., devs hostile to server-side WM decorations. But, I'm reserving judgment for now.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 15 2018, @01:23AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 15 2018, @01:23AM (#637991)

        And that quite reminded me of some old unix text that compared MIT with some other university, and claimed that MIT often got stuck trying to find perfect solutions and thus never getting anything out the door.

        And it may well seem that with the relative success of the Linux ecosystem, the MIT mentality of perfection has set in, and the likes of Wayland (and perhaps also systemd) is the result.