Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday June 17 2014, @05:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-so-secret-now dept.

For more than three years now, Microsoft has held to the line that it has loads of patents that are infringed by Google's Android operating system. "Licensing is the solution," wrote the company's head IP honcho in 2011, explaining Microsoft's decision to sue Barnes & Noble's Android-powered Nook reader.

Microsoft has revealed a few of those patents since as it has unleashed litigation against Android device makers. But for the most part, they've remained secret. That's led to a kind of parlor game where industry observers have speculated about what patents Microsoft might be holding over Android.

That long guessing game is now over. A list of hundreds of patents that Microsoft believes entitle it to royalties over Android phones, and perhaps smartphones in general, has been published on a Chinese language website.

More details are in the story, but too much to include in this summary.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Tuesday June 17 2014, @07:04AM

    by Tork (3914) on Tuesday June 17 2014, @07:04AM (#56263)
    There's no such thing as a secret patent. Basically articles like this spin ad views at places like Slashdot and Gizmodo.
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 17 2014, @10:01AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 17 2014, @10:01AM (#56289)

    The patents themselves are not secrets, obviously. What's been unknown is which patents. You could have gleaned that from just the summary, or even just from thinking about it for a moment or two. Sheesh Man, the headline itself says "secret list," not secret patents.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 17 2014, @04:11PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 17 2014, @04:11PM (#56489)

      If you knew anything about patents, like if you got your patent news outside of Micro$oft hating blogs, you'd know that's not possible.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 18 2014, @10:04AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 18 2014, @10:04AM (#56860)

        And by "that" you mean what?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 17 2014, @12:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 17 2014, @12:23PM (#56322)

    > There's no such thing as a secret patent

    It is the needle-in-a-haystack approach to secrecy.