Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Tuesday June 17 2014, @08:08AM   Printer-friendly
from the take-it-from-the-top dept.

Parkland Health & Hospital System in Dallas[1] will raise its own minimum wage to $10.25 an hour next month...
The wage increase will cost the hospital about $350,000 a year. The expense will be covered with money from the upcoming quarter's bonus pool for the hospital's 60 vice presidents and top executives.

After this, every worker employed by Dallas County will make at least $10.25 an hour (still not a living wage by many measures).
Note also that this will barely put a dent in that pool, expected to be at least $3M for the year.

[1] People who have memories of November 22, 1963 will remember that as a historic location

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by RaffArundel on Tuesday June 17 2014, @09:54PM

    by RaffArundel (3108) on Tuesday June 17 2014, @09:54PM (#56666) Homepage

    Honestly, you can use "decimated" and its connotation of 10% mortality to make this seem like a huge sacrifice, but no one's going to die.

    Nah, that was a joke that fell flat. There was something FINALLY that really was 10% (I have to listen to sports fans throw that word around a lot) so my stream of thought went that way.

    Let's be even more clear - there is nothing altruistic about this move. They want to keep the employees so they don't have to spend even more money hiring and training new people. If that makes the workers' lives better I am all for it. The submitter clearly finds anything less than full blown class warfare unacceptable - so I got trolled by TFS.

    In the libertarian utopia, companies pay their employees as much as possible in order to recruit the best labor. Don't you think "as much as possible" is more than the legally mandated minimum?

    Do libertarians actually believe that? This is a sincere question - because I thought they believed in paying that mythical "market value" (re: artificially deflated due to lack of actual competition) for talent.

    I guess the problem with answering your question is - what is "possible"? I speculate if you are just in it for the profit, "as much as possible" is actually "as little as possible". Conversely, if you have a business and you actually want your employees to be dare I say happy, perhaps the bottom line profit isn't what matters and you judge your success on customer satisfaction. In which case, it would be stupid to pay them a cut-rate amount.

    In this case, the hospital decided that paying the person previously at the lowest rung $8 an hour was a bad thing. They could easily afford it, so they gave them a raise. I'd like to see more of that.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2