Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Saturday February 24 2018, @01:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the the-world-needs-empathy dept.

Original URL: World leaders abandoning human rights: Amnesty

World leaders are undermining human rights for millions of people with regressive policies and hate-filled rhetoric, but their actions have ignited global protest movements in response, a rights group said.

US President Donald Trump, Russian leader Vladimir Putin, and China's President Xi Jinping were among a number of politicians who rolled out regressive policies in 2017, according to Amnesty International's annual human rights report published on Thursday.

The human rights body also mentioned the leaders of Egypt, the Philippines and Venezuela.

"The spectres of hatred and fear now loom large in world affairs, and we have few governments standing up for human rights in these disturbing times," Salil Shetty, Amnesty's secretary-general, said.

"Instead, leaders such as el-Sisi, Duterte, Maduro, Putin, Trump and Xi are callously undermining the rights of millions."

[...] The regressive approach to human rights adopted by a number of world leaders has, however, inspired new waves of social activism and protest, Amnesty said, highlighting the example of the Women's March in January last year, which began in the US before becoming a global protest.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Saturday February 24 2018, @04:48PM (5 children)

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Saturday February 24 2018, @04:48PM (#643067) Homepage Journal

    In its Emergency Room, Oregon Health & Sciences University has some holding cells in which they lock psychiatric patients so as to keep a lid on their demands that their rights be respected.

    The holding cells have no toilets.

    Even death row inmates get toilets. Why not the mentally ill?

    I first learned that one has a constitutional right to a toilet when I made some hilarity ensue in the Pasadena City Jail. They were going to put me into a toilet-less padded cell, but someone informed the deputy that I have a constitutional right to a toilet.

    Those holding cells also don't have telephones. Perhaps the Emergency staff is concerned that their prisoners might ring up attorneys.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by arcz on Saturday February 24 2018, @06:40PM (2 children)

    by arcz (4501) on Saturday February 24 2018, @06:40PM (#643112) Journal
    That's quite concerning. Maybe we should get this information to a relevant attorney. I have some contacts. Care to share more details?
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 24 2018, @07:12PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 24 2018, @07:12PM (#643125)

    Right to a toilet is covered under 8th amendment:

    http://jailhouselaw.org/your-right-to-be-free-from-cruel-and-unusual-punishment/ [jailhouselaw.org]

    Below are some of the most common Eighth Amendment challenges to prison conditions. Remember, to prevail on a claim for any of these, you must show both subjective and objective evidence.

    [...] Sanitation and Personal Hygiene: Prisoners are entitled to sanitary toilet facilities, DeSpain v. Uphoff, 264 F.3d 965 (10th Cir. 2001), proper trash procedures, no roach or rat infestations, and basic supplies such as toothbrushes, toothpaste, soap, sanitary napkins, razors, and cleaning products. See DeSpain (above) and Gillis v. Litscher, 468 F.3d 488 (7th Cir. 2006).

    -t

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 24 2018, @09:33PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 24 2018, @09:33PM (#643180)

      One of the nearby counties charges inmates for razors and haircuts. I wonder if that would apply? AFAIK they have no contingency for the indigent to access these things.