SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Facebook has removed a virtual reality shoot-em-up experience from a tech demo at a top American conservative conference after recieving criticism for being "tone deaf" following last week's deadly school shooting in Florida. The social network has a presence at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) conference in Maryland, this week, including a booth running a demo of its Oculus Rift virtual reality headset. This demo included a first-person shooting game.
People on Twitter have criticised Facebook for running this demo so soon after the deadly shooting attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School that left 17 people dead.
The game, Bullet Train, was just one of a number of standard Oculus games/demos that Facebook has included at public events. In fact, Bullet Train has been around since 2015, and the team that made it released a full game called Robo Recall, funded by Oculus:
The game will be an Oculus exclusive — that company is funding its development — and the five-to-ten-person team that created Bullet Train has ballooned into a full 15 person team at Epic in order to turn this into a real game with a release date in "early 2017." It will include a number of graphical jumps from Bullet Train, and this benefits Epic in other ways as well.
Yet, Facebook still tried to distance itself from the original demo:
The demo for the game, called "Bullet Train," is being developed by a third-party game-maker, not Oculus, the company said.
Why is Facebook at CPAC? Probably as part of an ongoing effort to placate conservatives angry at the platform.
This comes a few months after the Puerto Rico hurricane VR debacle.
Also at The Guardian and The Hill.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Mykl on Monday February 26 2018, @11:38PM (1 child)
You're absolutely right - we invite ourselves to travel down a slippery slope when we decide to censor anything.
However, SN has already started that journey with the blocking of a certain author who liked to discuss the genitalia of a particular racial demographic and their preference for youthful sexual pursuit. SN also blocks posts that include the name of a particular book in the Bible. This series of posts will be a little trickier to filter, but I see no reason why Mr. "I hate women" should stay here when we have removed those others (who, frankly IMO, were far less offensive).
The alternative is that we can stand firm in our conviction to defend to the death the right of others to say anything, and admire the barren wasteland that SN will become as people give up on this hate and abandon the place.
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Tuesday February 27 2018, @12:31AM
You make several good points. Thanks for sharing them.
While I think the moderation system is the best way to handle that sort of thing, you may well be correct that some folks may abandon the site.
It might even be that the same jackass(es) who were posting the stuff that's now filtered is(are) the one(s) posting the drivel du jour.
I'm unconvinced that deleting or filtering posts will make a difference in the long run, but it's not up to me.
Taking such actions could well be the goal of the scumbag(s) who are posting this garbage.
I also worry that deleting posts might end up stifling satire.
I guess we'll have to see what those with the power to make such decisions actually decide to do.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr