Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Woods on Thursday June 19 2014, @12:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the paid-to-proofread dept.

The Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit that operates Wikipedia and related projects, explained yesterday that it will establish new rules covering paid editing. The heart of the change is that anyone who is paid to edit the site must "add your affiliation to your edit summary, user page, or talk page, to fairly disclose your perspective," according to Wikimedia's explanation of the change. The organization has also published a FAQ on paid editing.
The changes come after some high-profile commotions over paid editing. In October, Wikipedia deleted more than 250 accounts believed to be connected to a PR firm that was writing articles on the site. In January, the Wikimedia Foundation fired an employee who was accused of taking paid editing gigs. Among the world's most heavily trafficked websites, Wikipedia ranks sixth, according to Alexa. It's the only top website that's owned by a non-profit.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Reziac on Thursday June 19 2014, @02:35AM

    by Reziac (2489) on Thursday June 19 2014, @02:35AM (#57236) Homepage

    #1 is a good point. But I think #2 requires that Wikipedia maintain a "Wall of Shame", because otherwise it's likely to mostly go unnoticed.

    As to the initial spate of jocular comments... yes, exactly how do you plan to enforce this? You might catch some by chance, but it's not like you even have positive IDs on most editors.

    --
    And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by AnythingGoes on Thursday June 19 2014, @04:24AM

    by AnythingGoes (3345) on Thursday June 19 2014, @04:24AM (#57259)

    And how easy is it to hide any form of payment?

    How do you differentiate between a true opinion held by someone against a paid opinion?

    Unless you have access to all bank records (in which case, cash is still possible?)

    • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Thursday June 19 2014, @05:11AM

      by Reziac (2489) on Thursday June 19 2014, @05:11AM (#57272) Homepage

      Yep, that was pretty much my thought... they must have some magic glasses that let them see all this info about every commercial editor.

      --
      And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.