Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Woods on Thursday June 19 2014, @02:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the fascinating-weather-patterns dept.

I heard an item on the radio where the twin twisters that clobbered a Nebraska community were said to be described by meteorologists as rare; the question "Is this due to climate change?" was also posed and left dangling. Investigating further at Google News, I found another item where a storm chaser was saying "I've never seen anything like this".

I then found an article by Andrew Freedman which says there's a wide range of tornado types and that storms which split aren't all that rare.

Pioneering tornado scientist Theodore Fujita, who devised the Fujita Tornado Damage Scale that is still used to classify tornado intensity, identified many types of tornadoes, some of which bore similarities to the twin twisters in Nebraska on Monday.

For example, the Palm Sunday tornado outbreak of 1965, during which nearly 50 tornadoes touched down and 271 people died, there was a well-documented dual tornado that struck close to Toledo, Ohio. A study Fujita published with his colleagues found that this tornado split for only a short time, coalescing back into a larger funnel soon after a famous picture was taken that bears some resemblance to the Pilger tornado.

"A single funnel split into two and then reorganized into one after about a minute," the study says.

Interesting reading.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by khallow on Wednesday June 25 2014, @02:11PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday June 25 2014, @02:11PM (#59870) Journal

    You have no data, you have no questions, you don't believe answers.

    Funny how this completely characterizes your approach.
     
     

    You looked into the research but couldn't say 1 thing about why it was flawed or wrong.

    1 thing: no evidence to support the assertion made. That's a deal killer.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2