Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday March 27 2018, @04:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the too-risky-to-keep-running-the-dept-generating dept.

In response to the passage of the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA), Craigslist has removed Personals sections for U.S. users:

Classified advertising website Craigslist has closed its dating ads section in the US, in response to a new bill against sex trafficking.

The bill states that websites can now be punished for "facilitating" prostitution and sex trafficking.

Ads promoting prostitution and child sexual abuse have previously been posted in the "personals" section of Craigslist.

The company said keeping the section open in the US was too much of a risk.

In a statement, Craigslist said the new law would "subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully".

Reddit also took the opportunity to ban a number of subreddits (list not exhaustive), including some like /r/escorts, but many more broadly related to "transactions for goods and services".

Also at Ars Technica and The Verge.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @05:50AM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @05:50AM (#658857)

    Despite the horrors perpetrated in American history, the U.S. still looks like a saint.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @06:10AM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @06:10AM (#658867)

    X being better than Y does not mean that X is good.

    And no, that's not what the US did; for a long time, it had slavery. The US could have chosen not to have slavery at all, but it didn't.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @06:25AM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @06:25AM (#658873)

      Slavery was already widespread by the time the United States was formed.

      The "infamous" text of the Constitution equating a black slave to 2/3 a person was in fact an attempt to diminish the role of slavery in the Union: It diminished the influence that slaveholding States had on the Federal government.

      That's what you mush-for-brains FUCKERS don't get. EVER. The United States was an ideal born in a world that was even WORSE than today.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @07:06AM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @07:06AM (#658883)

        Having slavery at all, in any form, is unacceptable, regardless of the circumstances. It doesn't matter how bad the world was.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @07:29AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @07:29AM (#658889)

          ... with regard to slavery, but much better with regard to so much more. THEN, America fixed the slavery issue; then, America fixed the segregation issue.

          At all stages, the fault belonged to this one particular organization of violent Men, known as "government".

          • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Tuesday March 27 2018, @05:42PM

            by HiThere (866) on Tuesday March 27 2018, @05:42PM (#659056) Journal

            Do remember that the US was one of the LAST of the European dominated countries to prohibit slavery. I believe that at one point the only two European dominated countries to allow slavery were the US and Brazil. Of course, Russia had the Kulaks, but that's supposedly a step up from slavery, and Russia isn't exactly a part of the European civilization, despite being nominally a part of Europe. (Since I'm including the US on cultural grounds, I can exclude Russia on exactly those same grounds.)

            That said, the US has been generally the most moral "world power" in history. And before them the British were the most moral "world power" in history. And before them the Catholic Church were the most moral "world power" in history. And before them the Romans were the most moral "world power" in history.

            In each case you can point out horrendous flaws. None of them really lived up to their stated ideals. All of them were eventually wrecked by their flaws. The real times of trouble, though, are the times of transition between the "world powers". This is especially troubling now when the US is failing, China is rising, and weapons of mass destruction are so potent. This is one of they reasons I hope for a quick appearance of a strong AI. I give a 50% chance that humanity won't live through that transition, but I give a 60% chance that humanity won't live the transition of power between the US and China....and we'll eventually have to handle the transition to strong AI anyway.

            --
            Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @04:15PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @04:15PM (#659029)

          "having" slavery? your freedom is your responsibility. there is no higher authority to plead your case to. you can be delusional and plead to the government, but they are the most powerful slave master, so good luck with that.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @03:47PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 27 2018, @03:47PM (#659017)

    And Jack the Ripper was a good guy because he's responsible for vastly less deaths than Hitler, right?