Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday April 16 2018, @10:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the Is-this-thing-on? dept.

Are we getting closer to a complete brain mapping? New devices explore more regions safely

Researchers at the University of Southern California Viterbi School of Engineering have developed thin, flexible polymer-based materials for use in microelectrode arrays that record activity more deeply in the brain and with more specific placement than ever before. What's more is that each microelectrode array is made up of eight "tines," each with eight microelectrodes which can record from a total 64 subregions of the brain at once.

In addition, the polymer-based material, called Parylene C, is less invasive and damaging to surrounding cells and tissue than previous microelectrode arrays comprised of silicon or microwires. However, the long and thin probes can easily buckle upon insertion, making it necessary to add a self-dissolving brace made up of polyethylene glycol (PEG) that shortens the array and prevents it from bending.

Professor Ellis Meng of the USC Viterbi Department of Biomedical Engineering and Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience said that the performance of the new polymer-based material is on par with microwires in terms of recording fidelity and sensitivity. "The information that we can get out is equivalent, but the damage is much less," Meng said. "Polymers are gentler on the brain, and because of that, these devices get recordings of neuronal communication over long periods of time."

Acute in vivo testing of a conformal polymer microelectrode array for multi-region hippocampal recordings (DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa9451) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 16 2018, @02:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 16 2018, @02:33PM (#667641)

    Would be interesting to know more about the "core" conductive part. From what little I know, matching any material to sense (but not interfere with) a nerve impulse is tricky.

    Jerry Lettvin talked about it a little when describing the experimental setup for "What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain" (easy to find this neat old paper). Nerves are not wires, the signals are electro-chemical, not just electric. His results were not easily repeated, in part because other labs had a lot of trouble reproducing his electrode setup. Jerry was somewhat of an electrical engineer as well as a biologist.