SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Announced shortly after the 1 year anniversary of the first revelations by Eric Snowden that American spy agencies have their fingers in everything, the Russian government will be funding a project to build a custom microprocessor. Codenamed Baikal (after the lake with Earth's largest volume of fresh water), it will be built around an ARM Cortex A57, a 64-bit architecture running at 2GHz. No core count or other details are available. First deliveries are expected in 2015.
The ARM architecture aligns with Vladimir Putin's goal, announced in 2010, to move all government computers onto Linux. It also comes in the wake of another large country's recent barring of some American technology in favor of a homegrown Linux distro.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Russia Plans to Dump Some American CPUs for Homegrown Technology
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 33 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
You humans are all alike.
(Score: 1, Offtopic) by martyb on Monday June 23 2014, @02:52AM
gewg_ wrote:
Upon seeing your comment here, I looked up the original submission [soylentnews.org] and found the AMD reference there, as well.
I agree it should have been ARM, and have updated the story.
Yes, it appears you did. The submission, however, lacked proper headline capitalization. Correcting this required modifying several words in the submission.
I am not one of the original editors, so I cannot speak to their thinking. To their credit, though, I would point out that it is common in the English language for pairs of words to go through a gradual "merging" process over time. Frequent occurrences of two words in sequence, will occasionally over time become a single, hyphenated word. Then, with still more time and use, this hyphenated word may become a single, non-hyphenated word. In other words, language evolves with time.
Still, I checked a few references. For example, I checked dictionary.com and found that both home-grown [reference.com] and homegrown [reference.com] are listed as valid words.
For consistency's sake, I have changed the headline text to match the spelling in the story text.
I found three links provided at the end of the submission; i.e. not imbedded in the text as hyperlinks.
This meant it was left to the editors to find a way to work the provided links into the story in some reasonable fashion. For whatever reason, the editors elected to not work the dangling link to Phoronix into the story text.
For the curious, that link was: Russia To Replace AMD/Intel CPUs With 64-bit ARM Hardware [phoronix.com].
I was a bit disturbed when my first story submissions were edited into something different than what I had submitted. I had put considerable work into formatting and phrasing it "just so". It was explained to me that is what editors do -- they edit things! Further, when I am editing a story, within about 10 minutes, things turn into a blur-of-text (which, in about 50-100 years will be spelled "bluroftext" :)
The work you see here is all done by volunteers who have families, day jobs, and all the other attendant challenges and distractions of life. Yet, they take time from their day and give it freely to support this web site. I've spent no less than an hour investigating and writing up this response, late on a Sunday night.
The point being that we do try our best, but sometimes things get past us. And, yes, that bugs us, too.
So, from my investigation, I see: (1) a mistake that was in the original submission made it past the editors and to the posted story; (2) Over-zealous correction of an incorrectly-capitalized headline introduced a different, though valid, spelling of a word; and (3) a separately-listed URL was not included in the story.
Wit is intellect, dancing.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 23 2014, @03:58AM
The work you see here is all done by volunteers
My single-word subject line and the rest appears more harsh than my actual feelings.
I use really nasty words when I'm truly upset.
I was a bit disturbed when my first story submissions were edited
The thing I objected to most, I didn't mention:
the addition of "some" to the title.
The Russian gov't (like the Chinese gov't) appears to want American technology out of the loop, so that was blunted.
...and, of course, I always assume that my own work is flawless. :roll:
-- gewg_