Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday April 25 2018, @11:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the now,-let's-look-at-some-of-those-dodgy-claims dept.

World IP Review reports

Inter partes reviews (IPRs) do not violate the US Constitution and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board has authority to invalidate patents.

This is the holding of the US Supreme Court, which handed down its decision in Oil States Energy Services v Greene's Energy Group today.

In June last year, the court granted[1] Oil States' petition for certiorari.

Oil States, a provider of services to oil and gas companies, had claimed that the IPR process at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) violates the right to a jury in an Article III court (a federal court established under Article III of the US Constitution).

The service provider added that although in certain situations non-Article III tribunals may exercise jurisdiction over disputes involving "public rights", this doesn't apply to IPRs because patents are private property rights.

The Supreme Court asked the government to weigh in--Noel Francisco, the acting solicitor general, submitted a brief[1] on behalf of the US government in October 2017.

"Consistent with longstanding practice, the Patent Act authorises USPTO examiners within the executive branch to determine in the first instance whether patents should be granted. That allocation of authority is clearly constitutional", he said.

Siding with the US government, in a 7-2 opinion, the Supreme Court rejected Oil States' argument and found that patents are "public" rights, not "private" in an IPR context.

"The primary distinction between IPR and the initial grant of a patent is that IPR occurs after the patent has issued. But that distinction does not make a difference here", said the court.

[1] Paywall after first article, apparently.

Also at Ars Technica.


Original Submission   Alternate Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday April 25 2018, @06:25PM (2 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 25 2018, @06:25PM (#671765) Journal

    God didn't give us inalienable rights to unlimited length patents and copyrights?

    --
    People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday April 25 2018, @06:48PM (1 child)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Wednesday April 25 2018, @06:48PM (#671777) Homepage Journal

    Shit, man, he didn't even give us britches to keep the skeeters off our tender bits.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday April 25 2018, @08:45PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 25 2018, @08:45PM (#671849) Journal

      Then it must not be a right.

      (maybe a wrong or a left)

      Q. Who made the biggest mistake in history?
      A. Noah when he didn't swat the two flies while he had the chance.

      --
      People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.