Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday May 01 2018, @04:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the self-incrimination dept.

Associated Press affiliate KTAR-FM reports

[...] after 25-year-old Xavier Moran was involved in a crash on April 5, he told a sheriff's deputy he had been cut off by another driver and could prove it with his dashboard camera. He then signed a consent waiver to search the camera.

When the Palm Beach County Sheriff's deputy reviewed the footage, he saw Moran burglarizing a beauty store. Authorities say the video showed Moran taking a baseball bat from the trunk and someone using the bat to break the glass door to the store.

He was arrested [April 10] on burglary charges.

Boing Boing further reports that the guy just can't stay out of trouble.

I first heard the story via NPR's "news" quiz show "Wait, Wait...Don't Tell Me".


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 01 2018, @04:58AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 01 2018, @04:58AM (#674045)

    after 25-year-old Xavier Moran was involved in a crash on April 5, he told a sheriff's deputy he had been cut off by another driver and could prove it with his dashboard camera. He then signed a consent waiver to search the camera.

    Do you find that talking to the police just isn't as exciting as it once was? Try consenting to police searches as well! Twice the fun and nothing can possibly go wrong with this plan!

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by realDonaldTrump on Tuesday May 01 2018, @05:13AM (1 child)

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Tuesday May 01 2018, @05:13AM (#674049) Homepage Journal

    President Clinton, Bill Clinton, is a great friend of mine. I'm not even sure that he shouldn't have just gone in and taken the Fifth Amendment.

    • (Score: 4, Touché) by The Archon V2.0 on Tuesday May 01 2018, @09:01PM

      by The Archon V2.0 (3887) on Tuesday May 01 2018, @09:01PM (#674314)

      > President Clinton, Bill Clinton, is a great friend of mine.

      It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is.

  • (Score: 4, Funny) by terrab0t on Tuesday May 01 2018, @12:07PM (1 child)

    by terrab0t (4674) on Tuesday May 01 2018, @12:07PM (#674115)

    I was thinking the same thing. I would consult my lawyer and submit only the relevant dash cam footage in court.

    • (Score: 5, Interesting) by DannyB on Tuesday May 01 2018, @06:20PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday May 01 2018, @06:20PM (#674243) Journal

      I would consult my lawyer and submit only the relevant dash cam footage in court.

      Talk with lawyer: Good.

      Submit only partial footage: Bad.

      The other side is probably going to want the entire original recording media. Not something extracted and potentially edited. They, and their experts get access to the evidence while a full copy is made in the presence of both sets of lawyers.

      If all you want to present is an "edit" or extracted portion, this instantly raises lots of thorny questions. Did you edit this? How do I know you didn't edit it? I want this video evidence thrown out of court... through the 3rd floor window. Motion to strike... the plaintiff! Etc.

      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

      Personal experience. I once co-wrote a Mac program called Timbuktu. Just over a decade later I was contacted by victims of a patent troll. I was able to provide them with an unopened shrinkwrap original package of the product that was collecting dust in my attic. This was a product advertised and sold commercially long before the patent troll's supposed invention. The troll's patent was internally inconsistent in mutually-exclusive contradictory ways. I shipped it registered mail to the defense lawyers as instructed -- not to the defendants or plaintiffs. Both sets of lawyers and experts would open the package together and make copies of the documentation and disks. Despite the sentimental value of the original shrinkwrap package, I didn't mind them opening it considering the amount of money I was receiving as an expert witness. Even more if this were to go to trial. Which it didn't. Funny how bullies cave. Finally, some months later, they returned my original product and box intact, except for shrinkwrap. Now collecting more dust.

      --
      Young people won't believe you if you say you used to get Netflix by US Postal Mail.