The Higgs boson is delightfully stirring the mud puddle in the astrophysics community even after found! Instead of clearing everything up, now more questions have to be asked.
British cosmologists are puzzled: they predict that the universe should not have lasted for more than a second. This startling conclusion is the result of combining the latest observations of the sky with the recent discovery of the Higgs boson. Robert Hogan of King's College London (KCL) presents the new research on June 24 at the Royal Astronomical Society's National Astronomy Meeting in Portsmouth.
The controversy seems to be about one of the predictions of BICEP2 allegedly being observed, and if so, Robert Hogan seems to think that if they did see this effect, then the universe would not exist today, it would have went straight to 'Big Crunch' right after the 'Big Bang'.
Pop the corn, this may be a good one!
(Score: 5, Insightful) by MrGuy on Wednesday June 25 2014, @12:25AM
what these scientist are saying is that IF the BICEP II results are true, AND the Higgs boson was in fact discovered, then the universe shouldn't exist.
Given that many sources (us included) have already reported that the BICEP II team is no longer certain their results are correct after peer review, I'm personally planning to doubt the BICEP II results rather than doubt the universe exists. Sum ergo cogito.
Your Cosmology Of Choice May Vary.
(Score: 2, Informative) by MrGuy on Wednesday June 25 2014, @12:28AM
Sorry, I could swear I had the link to the previous Soylent News article in the parent...
http://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=14/06/23/1341232 [soylentnews.org]