Google has demonstrated an AI assistant that can make phone calls on your behalf, speaking to the human on the other end of the line. The company showed off the capability by playing a recording of a phone call it claims was between its chatbot and a hair salon:
Onstage at I/O 2018, Google showed off a jaw-dropping new capability of Google Assistant: in the not too distant future, it's going to make phone calls on your behalf. CEO Sundar Pichai played back a phone call recording that he said was placed by the Assistant to a hair salon. The voice sounded incredibly natural; the person on the other end had no idea they were talking to a digital AI helper. Google Assistant even dropped in a super casual "mmhmmm" early in the conversation.
Pichai reiterated that this was a real call using Assistant and not some staged demo. "The amazing thing is that Assistant can actually understand the nuances of conversation," he said. "We've been working on this technology for many years. It's called Google Duplex."
There is already a debate about whether this is a good idea:
The selfishness of Google Duplex
Google's AI sounds like a human on the phone — should we be worried?
Google Duplex: Good or Evil?
(Score: 2) by Dr Spin on Friday May 11 2018, @06:48AM (1 child)
We have to take care of people. If you can’t take care of your sick in the country, forget it, it’s all over.
Its not over til the fat lady sings (Madame La Guillotine).
If you fuck the poor, they have a big incentive to kill you. If they are in danger of dying, they have nothing to lose.
This is not news - its already happening.
You might want to read up on the French Revolution, Al Quaida, Boko Haram, ISIS, etc.
Warning: Opening your mouth may invalidate your brain!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 11 2018, @01:24PM
Hmm. I am not well versed in the events of the 18th and 19th century in Europe. Is the French revolution unlike the others listed? My naïve understanding might have me list the American Revolution beside Al Quaida, Boko Haram, and ISIS as revolutions that came about with foreign material aid (France in the former most case, USA in the 3 latter cases). Did the French Revolution have substantial foreign material support?
So I suppose I must take your advice and do some reading.