Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.

Regulation Coming to Lab-Grown Meat

posted by Fnord666 on Monday May 14 2018, @03:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the what's-the-beef? dept.

takyon writes:

Don't listen to Big Cattle — lab-grown meat should still be called "meat"

Lab-grown meat is on its way, and the government is trying to figure out how to regulate it. This week, the US House of Representatives [pdf] released a draft spending bill that proposes that the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulate lab-grown meat and figure out how it should be labeled — which is a contentious topic since Big Cattle doesn't want it to be called "meat." Regulation is important, and there's plenty more to learn, but the USDA shouldn't be the only one regulating. And when the product comes to market, yes, it should be called "meat."

Traditional meat, of course, comes from animals that are raised and slaughtered. Lab-grown meat (also called "in-vitro meat," "cultured meat," or "clean meat") is made from animal stem cells grown in a lab. But because the stem cells are typically fed with a serum derived from the blood of calf fetuses, the product uses animal products and isn't vegan. Still, the pitch for lab-grown meat is that it saves animals and also helps the environment because lab-grown meat doesn't take much land or energy to grow. Plus, lab-grown meat doesn't directly create methane emissions, while methane emissions from cows accounted for 16 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2015.

Because of the way that government agencies work, it hasn't even been clear who should regulate lab meat. The USDA traditionally regulates meat, while the US Food and Drug Administration regulates food safety and additives. The proposal that the USDA be in charge of regulation is in line with what the [pdf] National Cattlemen's Beef Association wanted, but some lab-meat advocates fear that USDA will be biased against them in favor of traditional meat. If the USDA will be regulating lab meat, it should at least collaborate with the FDA. There are no slaughterhouses for the USDA to inspect anyway, and the FDA has already been regulating food technology, like the genetically engineered salmon it approved. It makes the most sense for the two to work together.

Previously: U.S. Cattlemen's Association Wants an Official Definition of "Meat"

Related: Lab-Grown Chicken (and Duck) Could be on the Menu in 4 Years
Cargill, Bill Gates, Richard Branson Backed Memphis Meats Expects Meat From Cells in Stores by 2021
'Soylent' Dawkins? Atheist Mulls 'Taboo Against Cannibalism' Ending as Lab-Grown Meat Improves

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Regulation Coming to Lab-Grown Meat | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 25 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by black6host on Monday May 14 2018, @04:08AM (3 children)

    by black6host (3827) on Monday May 14 2018, @04:08AM (#679410) Journal

    Lab-grown meat (also called "in-vitro meat," "cultured meat," or "clean meat") is made from animal stem cells grown in a lab. But because the stem cells are typically fed with a serum derived from the blood of calf fetuses, the product uses animal products and isn't vegan.

    I think the fact that the stem cells are animal in nature would preclude such a product from being considered vegan. Serum from the blood of calf fetuses is just the satanic dressing on it all :)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Monday May 14 2018, @04:13AM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday May 14 2018, @04:13AM (#679411) Journal

    Oops, wtf. A better way to say it would be "still requires some degree of animal suffering", even though it is on par with abortion which many would support.

    The thing about the serum has been mentioned since the lab-grown burger was first showed off. They could probably replace it with something else or culture that substance as well, and just haven't gone around to doing or talking about it.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 14 2018, @10:40AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 14 2018, @10:40AM (#679514)

      But because the stem cells are typically fed with a serum derived from the blood of calf fetuses, the product uses animal products and isn't vegan. Still, the pitch for lab-grown meat is that it saves animals and also helps the environment because lab-grown meat doesn't take much land or energy to grow. Plus, lab-grown meat doesn't directly create methane emissions, while methane emissions from cows accounted for 16 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2015.

      Using a produce of a living cow means a cow still has to graze, drink water, fart methane, etc. for it to be obtained! This is just one additional complicating step which only arguably lightens human conscience because it allegedly doesn't mess up with bovine central nervous system, although mother cow most probably is NOT happy about humans leeching blood from her unborn calf. Until this lab meat can be grown without constantly feeding it anything from another living, or recently departed animal, it is pretty much pointless.