Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Monday May 14 2018, @01:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the tilting-at-windmills dept.

Famed hardware hacker Bunnie Huang announces his newest project and goes into detail about how trouble from the DMCA was the impetus. He comments that unchecked power to license freedom of expression should not be trusted to corporate interests. The project, NeTV2, is being crowdfunded.

I'd like to share a project I'm working on that could have an impact on your future freedoms in the digital age. It's an open video development board I call NeTV2.

It's related to a lawsuit I've filed with the help of the EFF against the US government to reform Section 1201 of the DMCA. Currently, Section 1201 imbues media cartels with nearly unchecked power to prevent us from innovating and expressing ourselves, thus restricting our right to free speech.

At Boing Boing : Innovation should be legal; that's why I'm launching NeTV2


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Adamsjas on Monday May 14 2018, @05:42PM (1 child)

    by Adamsjas (4507) on Monday May 14 2018, @05:42PM (#679662)

    QUOTE: Indeed, the GPL has never been well tested in the court system

    Hasn't it won every test it was subject to? In many countries?
    Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it had.

    When people stop contesting an issue, because the lose every case, isn't that a definition of "well tested"?
    If not, what do you think is missing?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 14 2018, @06:17PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 14 2018, @06:17PM (#679693)

    On just 13 May 2017: [theregister.co.uk]

    For now, GNU GPL is an enforceable contract, says US federal judge

    A question mark over whether the GNU GPL – the widely used free-software license – is enforceable as a contract may have been resolved by a US federal judge…

    The judge concluded that the GPL constitutes a contract, even though the FSF's long-held position is apparently that it is not a contract. In the judge's decision, there is talk of how other copyright cases

    Also, such a case is subject to appeal, and nothing related to copyleft case law has ever made its way to the Supreme Court.

    Furthermore, as the U.S. dictates world policy, especially regarding copyrights and contracts, that strongly suggests that the GPL's standing the world is still not very secure.

    From what I know, there have been a number of settlements, but those are not judgments that form case law.