Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Friday May 25 2018, @12:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-want-to-drive-in-the-other-lane;-I-want-to-merge-like-humans-do dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

In the field of self-driving cars, algorithms for controlling lane changes are an important topic of study. But most existing lane-change algorithms have one of two drawbacks: Either they rely on detailed statistical models of the driving environment, which are difficult to assemble and too complex to analyze on the fly; or they're so simple that they can lead to impractically conservative decisions, such as never changing lanes at all.

At the International Conference on Robotics and Automation tomorrow, researchers from MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) will present a new lane-change algorithm that splits the difference. It allows for more aggressive lane changes than the simple models do but relies only on immediate information about other vehicles' directions and velocities to make decisions.

[...] One standard way for autonomous vehicles to avoid collisions is to calculate buffer zones around the other vehicles in the environment. The buffer zones describe not only the vehicles' current positions but their likely future positions within some time frame. Planning lane changes then becomes a matter of simply staying out of other vehicles' buffer zones.

[...] With the MIT researchers' system, if the default buffer zones are leading to performance that's far worse than a human driver's, the system will compute new buffer zones on the fly — complete with proof of collision avoidance.

Let me know when someone finds an algorithm that can deal with unknown situations as intuitively as human beings can. Until then...

Source: http://news.mit.edu/2018/driverless-cars-change-lanes-like-human-drivers-0523


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by aristarchus on Friday May 25 2018, @06:50PM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Friday May 25 2018, @06:50PM (#684141) Journal

    or they're so simple that they can lead to impractically conservative decisions, such as never changing lanes at all.

    Impractially conservative? As opposed to antsy, Amphetamine-fuelled, alt-right weaving through traffic for no reason other than you have a rabid wolverine in your underpants? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KThlYHfIVa8 [youtube.com]

    Funny how the same arguments are made for autonomous killing machines: Robots will not do My Lai, and will follow Rules of Engagement more ethically than humans could, because robots do not become murderously pissed. So autonomously-killing auto-navigating automobiles would have no emotional issues in being "impractically conservative" if that was more practical. In fact, they may also be completely unemotional in deploying on-board SSM's to remove radically edgy alt-right lane-changers from the driving public, for the greater safety of all.

    --
    #Freearistarchus, again!!!!!1!!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3