Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday June 12 2018, @08:26AM   Printer-friendly
from the glimpse-behind-the-Great-Firewall dept.

The Globe and Mail covers an unpublished Chinese censorship document revealing sweeping effort to eradicate online political content.

Chinese authorities have tightened their grip on the country's online broadcasting platforms, banning a long list of content – everything from tattoos to religious proselytizing, violations of "mainstream values," flirtatious dancing, images of leaders and Western political critiques – as the government seeks to stamp out any venue that could be used for dissent or behaviour it considers obscene, according to an unpublished censorship directive obtained by The Globe and Mail.

The meteoric growth of online video services in China has offered a vibrant venue for creativity and, occasionally, obscenity and political protest – unleashing a daily riptide of user-made cat videos, pranks and glimpses of everyday life. Hundreds of millions of people in China watch short video clips and live-stream video every month.

Chinese authorities have responded with strict new rules, ordering online broadcasters to eradicate a wide range of content, according to the document obtained by The Globe, which is entitled "Management requirements for live service information and content."

The document is being used as a master guideline for content blocking by some of the country's most-used video sites, multiple sources in the industry told The Globe. It began circulating early this year, and is believed to have been issued by the powerful Cyberspace Administration of China, China's central Internet authority, which did not respond to requests for comment.

Comments from Amnesty International and other organizations are included. The document outlines ten basic categories of banned content and provides insight into the Chinese government's goals.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 12 2018, @03:15PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 12 2018, @03:15PM (#691942)

    From wswswswswsws, The end of net neutrality: The US ruling elite escalates campaign of internet censorship [wsws.org]:

    The proponents of abolishing net neutrality, led by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, argue that the vast powers granted to ISPs are irrelevant because users will be free to switch ISPs if they are not satisfied with the actions of their current provider. This argument is so absurd that it hardly merits refutation.

    Despite this overwhelming public opposition, the ending of net neutrality on Monday was met largely with silence on the part of the Democrats and their aligned media outlets, and the implementation of this sweeping attack on democratic rights was not even mentioned on the evening news. As with everything else in America, popular opinion in the end counts for nothing.

    Over the past year, Google and the social media monopolies Facebook and Twitter have moved to implement a regime of internet censorship at the behest of the US intelligence agencies, for which the Democrats have served as the mouthpieces. The companies have worked to substantially diminish the readership of left-wing, anti-war and socialist websites—including the World Socialist Web Site —in the name of fighting “fake news” and “Russian meddling.”

    The ending of net neutrality marks a new stage in the drive to censor the internet. With the vast majority of written communication—and an ever-growing section of all communication—taking place online, the drive to censor and control the internet is a major step toward abolition of the freedom of expression in the United States.

    Emphasis mine.

    This is not the outcome merely of a change in administrations. It is part of a shift in the class policy of the ruling elite. The 2016 election, with its broad abstention by the working class amid widespread hostility to Hillary Clinton, the favored candidate of Wall Street, and the subsequent strike movement by teachers independently of the unions, has made clear to the ruling elite that the imposition of internet censorship is necessary for the defense of its domination of society.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Tuesday June 12 2018, @06:28PM (2 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Tuesday June 12 2018, @06:28PM (#692044) Journal

    These would be the proverbial interesting times, it seems...

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday June 12 2018, @08:44PM (1 child)

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday June 12 2018, @08:44PM (#692097) Journal

      When I was doing graduate work in Manchuria I made money on the side as a paid lecturer. I was trying to work that curse into one of my speeches on industrialization and modernity and asked my Chinese roommate, a PhD candidate in physics at China's equivalent of M.I.T., what the exact saying in Mandarin was and he had no idea what I was talking about. So I asked my professors in social sciences, history, and literature there and they had never heard of it either.

      It turned out one of the most famous sayings people know about China and repeat often is completely fictional. No such curse or saying exists.

      On a slightly related note, nobody in China says 'chop chop' either. In Mandarin people say 'kuai kuai,' which sounds nothing like 'chop chop.'

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 13 2018, @03:17AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 13 2018, @03:17AM (#692202)

        Thank you for confirming my suspicions. I have spent time in China too and consider myself decently familiar with Chinese culture, and I have never seen this chestnut come from anywhere but US talking heads.

        "Kuai dian" is what I told taxi drivers if they needed to get a move on, but "chop-chop" seems to have attestable origins within (Pidgin) Cantonese.