So, with any bunch of data, we can start to draw some reasonable conclusions from it. Here's what I got, I'd love to hear your opinions below:
There's probably a lot more I could draw from this data, but I don't want to color the communities' impressions beside stating the obvious, so I'd like to hear what you think about it, and then go from there.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 27 2014, @06:26PM
> Slashcode's internal statistics monitor is badly out of touch of
> reality; it reports our traffic is 80% higher than piWik does. This
> might be an artificat of bitrot, varnish, or something else entirely.
I'd bet a lot of that is due to not tracking https users. If there is one demographic that is going to use https, it is the one right here. When you guys turned it on, I changed my bookmark and so all of my activity here since then has been https.
(Score: 3, Informative) by lhsi on Friday June 27 2014, @06:30PM
I do most my browsing via https too, and I think I'm somewhat active.
(Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday June 27 2014, @06:58PM
Wasn't piWik supposed to be a voluntary thing? We have a lot of paranoids (and lazy people like me) here who aren't too hot with the idea of installing monitoring software on our computers. It stands to reason that, if people are reluctant to install piWik, then the results between the two aren't gonna jibe.
Or maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, and somebody could provide a better explanation?
(Score: 3, Funny) by NCommander on Friday June 27 2014, @07:13PM
piWik is a server side package that tracks users via a bit of code at the bottom of every page load (you can see it with View Source). You can opt-out of it via the link on the FAQ page or in the site news bar, or by setting your DNT header.
Still always moving
(Score: 1) by Justin Case on Tuesday July 01 2014, @12:21PM
Because the https RSS feed still gives links as http, I hand-edit the URL back to https before loading it. My browser does not load http objects into an https page, because that would leak data via the referer header.
And you shouldn't have to even ask if I'm going to give the big bad world control of my browser. No scripts for me thank you.
So, you're not going to see me in piWik, not even with your <noscript><p><img src="http://stats.soylentnews.org/piwik/piwik.php?idsite=1"...
Try your web logs! (Does anyone still know they exist?)
Also, you'll have no way to measure how long I stay on the page. A few zeros will pull down an average pretty quickly.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 27 2014, @08:03PM
> Or maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, and somebody could provide a better explanation?
Story of your life dude, perfectly summed up in one sentence.
(Score: 1, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday June 27 2014, @08:57PM
Gargle on my balls, sacksuck.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 27 2014, @09:57PM
> Gargle on my balls, sacksuck.
And that is why your claim to be a "professional troll" is just a delusion.
Professionals don't lose their shit when they get pwned by an amateur.
(Score: 2) by frojack on Friday June 27 2014, @08:20PM
The other unbelievable stat was the length of a visit being 10 seconds.
You can't even read the first story in 10 seconds, so I suspect there is something amiss in measuring the dwell time or tying subsequent page views to the same visit session.
With so many people using tabbed browsers these days, I suspect lots of people read the main page, and open interesting stories in tabs, and maybe reply in a third tab, and each is showing up as less a separate than 10 second visit.
Either that or a lot of people, look, see no new stories, and bail out.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 1) by lentilla on Saturday June 28 2014, @06:06AM
That's what happens when the boss walks past and you scramble to close the browser.