So, with any bunch of data, we can start to draw some reasonable conclusions from it. Here's what I got, I'd love to hear your opinions below:
There's probably a lot more I could draw from this data, but I don't want to color the communities' impressions beside stating the obvious, so I'd like to hear what you think about it, and then go from there.
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Friday June 27 2014, @09:53PM
Which doesn't mean users don't use it anyway, by conscious use.
However it is also a reasonable guess that a high percentage of the users here uses NoScript and/or DNT. If I understood the summary correctly, those are not counted either.
Maybe a poll about that subject might be a good idea. While not as accurate as actual measurements, it might give at least a hint at how many users use https/NoScript/DNT.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 2) by elf on Friday June 27 2014, @11:19PM
Do a lot of people use things like Ghostery too? This would block pwiki (I just noticed my browser does). I think an 80% difference is too large to be caused by bad slashcode. I think something else is at play here too.
I noticed there was a flag to opt in to the analytics, were AC's automatically in or out? (as they can't choose settings)
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Saturday June 28 2014, @12:07AM
The flag is set as a local cookie, its not attached to a user account. For cookie allergic users, the DNT flag is honored as well.
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by mrider on Saturday June 28 2014, @03:41AM
I for one am probably screwing up the stats. I use ABP, No Script, Ghostery, and Self-Destructing Cookies. I have all those set to allow this site 100%, but it sounds like you still get skewed stats...
Doctor: "Do you hear voices?"
Me: "Only when my bluetooth is charged."