Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Sunday June 17 2018, @07:40PM   Printer-friendly
from the year-of-the-snitch dept.

The Associated Press and the Everett Washington HeraldNet carry a story about a 30 year old double murder solved using Public Genealogy Sites similar to the Golden State Killer story carried here on SoylentNews.

Deaths of two Canadian visitors shopping in the Seattle area were unsolved since 1987.

The deaths remained a mystery for more than 30 years, until DNA led to a major breakthrough. A genealogist, CeCe Moore, worked with experts at Parabon NanoLabs to build a family tree for the suspect, based on the genetic evidence recovered from the crime scenes. They used data that had been uploaded by distant cousins to public genealogy websites. They pinpointed a suspect, Talbott, a trucker living north of Sea-Tac International Airport.

Police kept him under surveillance until a paper cup fell from his truck in Seattle in early May. A swab of DNA from the cup came back as a match to the evidence that had waited 30 years. Before then, Talbott had never been considered a suspect. Days later he was in handcuffs.

This time the police used Parabon NanoLabs (more well-known for generating facial models from mere samples of DNA) to build a family tree of the killer by submitting the 30 year old crime scene DNA samples to multiple genealogy sites.

Results from those sites were combined by a Parabon genealogist to map the family of distant cousins found in those data bases. Police were then able to narrow down the list using other methods unmentioned.

Neither article mentions if any family members were stalked by police while being eliminated as suspects, or whether any samples were submitted by other family members.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 17 2018, @07:57PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 17 2018, @07:57PM (#694334)

    This is one of those new areas in forensics and law enforcement where I feel like the cure is going to quickly get worse than the disease.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Troll=1, Insightful=2, Underrated=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by frojack on Sunday June 17 2018, @08:10PM

    by frojack (1554) on Sunday June 17 2018, @08:10PM (#694336) Journal

    When they ask you for a DNA sample for exclusionary purposes you can bet it's going straight into a national database even when it does in fact exclude you.

    Because, surely if your third cousin was a rapist, you must be too. /Sarcasm

    So far police have been quite sensitive to the potential for abuse, but they've also been very circumspect about exactly what level of invasive or coersive investigation methods are employed. We've learned to be suspicious when police start keeping methodology secret.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday June 18 2018, @08:26PM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Monday June 18 2018, @08:26PM (#694690) Homepage
    But how can you be doubful of a companies suh as those who are "more well-known for generating facial models from mere samples of DNA"? Everything they output is guaranteed to be 100% reliable, double pinkie promise.

    I bet you every time they've generated a model that's impressed anyone, they already had a related photo to work from.

    Me, cynical?
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves