Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday June 29 2014, @12:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the undeclared-email-accounts dept.

California's top court agreed Friday to decide whether government employees' personal texts and e-mails are subject to disclosure under public records law. At least one other state high court, Alaska's, has already required disclosure and preservation of those communications if they deal with government business. Arizona's highest court has ruled that private communications with a "substantial nexus" to government activity are subject to disclosure.

Still, there's been a hodgepodge of lower-court state rulings nationwide on the topic, leaving much of the country's public officials across the 50 states to conceal their official communications ( http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2013/05/15/when-are-public-officials-calls-and-emails-public-records/ ) from public review. Federal officials' private electronic communications, however, are subject to the Freedom of Information Act ( http://informationrightsandwrongs.com/2012/04/12/when-are-emails-subject-to-foia/ ) if they concern government business.

The story from Ars Technica is here.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by redneckmother on Monday June 30 2014, @03:28AM

    by redneckmother (3597) on Monday June 30 2014, @03:28AM (#61791)

    If you can adjust to .gov life instead of .com, and you're not corrupt...

    Okay, that boolean expression ALWAYS returns FALSE.

    --
    Mas cerveza por favor.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3