Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Tuesday July 01 2014, @07:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the St.-Louis-still-misses-you,-Baton-Bob dept.

"Baton Bob" (wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baton_Bob) is a street performer in Atlanta, Georgia. In June 2013, Atlanta police arrested Baton Bob during the middle of a street performance, after a verbal altercation Bob had with mall security guards.

Baton Bob has now filed a federal lawsuit accusing Atlanta police of violating his constitutional rights, assault, discrimination, privacy violations and identify theft.

What makes this SoylentNews-worthy is that Atlanta Police forced Baton Bob to post a pro-police statement on his Facebook page before officers would allow Bob to be released on bond. According to the lawsuit:

At approximately 3:40 p.m., while Plaintiff sat handcuffed and without an attorney, he was told to dictate a public statement to Officer Davis, who then typed and posted the message to the Baton Bob Facebook account. The message read:

First of all, the atl police officer that responded to the incident thru security has been very respectful and gracious to me even in handcuffs. So, the situation escalated from a complaint from a security officer in the area and for some reason she rolled up on me like she didn't know who I was and like I had not been there before. For them to call police to come to intervene was not necessary. So, out of it, because of my fury, the Atlanta police officer did not understand the elements of the situation, so he was trying to do his job, respectfully and arrested my ass!!!!!!!!! I'll be out tomorrow so look out for my show at 14th and Peachtree. So now I'm waiting to be transported so I can sign my own bond and get the hell out of here. I want to verify, that the Atlanta police was respectful to me considering the circumstances. See you when I see you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As promised, Plaintiff was then given a signature bond and released from jail.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Lemming on Tuesday July 01 2014, @08:49AM

    by Lemming (1053) on Tuesday July 01 2014, @08:49AM (#62369)

    So he had to post this text, and then he was released. He should have edited the Facebook post immediately afterwards, saying he was forced to post the previous text. Maybe he did, it's clear in the article if he corrected the post immediately or if he posted about it later on. This would definitely have backfired for the police department, I think.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Tuesday July 01 2014, @09:24AM

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Tuesday July 01 2014, @09:24AM (#62377) Journal

    As soon as the police saw the updated post, you can bet they'd find an excuse to haul him in again and make him miserable. Now he's lawyered up and gone public they'd be idiots (that is, even more idiotic than usual) to try to intimidate him now.

    Besides, if you really want to vent your righteous outrage and see the wicked punished and humiliated, a courtroom has far more potential for satisfaction (not to mention cash) than a crappy boo-hoo post on your farcebook page.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by c0lo on Tuesday July 01 2014, @09:31AM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 01 2014, @09:31AM (#62378) Journal

      a crappy boo-hoo post on your faecebook page.

      FTFY

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
      • (Score: 2) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Tuesday July 01 2014, @10:20AM

        by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Tuesday July 01 2014, @10:20AM (#62386) Journal

        Better than mine, thanks.

        • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Tuesday July 01 2014, @10:36AM

          by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 01 2014, @10:36AM (#62390) Journal
          Simply looked better in the context of the "crappy" theme.
          --
          https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Tuesday July 01 2014, @02:35PM

    by tangomargarine (667) on Tuesday July 01 2014, @02:35PM (#62480)

    As far as I know you can't edit a post directly on your profile after you submit it, although you can edit comments on it. You can however delete it.

    (yes yes I'm a facebook user shun shun etc.)

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 1) by Lemming on Tuesday July 01 2014, @03:13PM

      by Lemming (1053) on Tuesday July 01 2014, @03:13PM (#62501)

      As far as I know you can't edit a post directly on your profile after you submit it, although you can edit comments on it. You can however delete it.

      Yes, you can edit your posts after you posted. If you click on the down arrow in the upper right corner of one of your posts, you get a pop-up menu including an "Edit..." option. Afterwards, your post will have an indicator "Edited" next to the post timestamp, which anyone can click to see the editing history.

    • (Score: 2) by Lagg on Tuesday July 01 2014, @04:35PM

      by Lagg (105) on Tuesday July 01 2014, @04:35PM (#62545) Homepage Journal

      Mister, I shun you for one reason and one reason only. That uid is brain-itchingly short of a good number.

      --
      http://lagg.me [lagg.me] 🗿
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 01 2014, @04:39PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 01 2014, @04:39PM (#62549)

        So, 668 would float your boat better?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 08 2014, @08:31PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 08 2014, @08:31PM (#66174)

        667 - Neighbor of the Beast

  • (Score: 2) by hubie on Tuesday July 01 2014, @05:08PM

    by hubie (1068) on Tuesday July 01 2014, @05:08PM (#62565) Journal

    Is it considered a Streisand effect if you are doing it to purposely get attention drawn to you?