Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Saturday July 28 2018, @04:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the privacy-versus-prosperity dept.

Submitted via IRC for Fnord666_

The Trump administration is working on a set of data privacy protections, the Washington Post reports, and according to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, officials have held 22 meetings with more than 80 companies and groups since last month. Companies like Facebook, Google, AT&T and Comcast have been involved, according to four Washington Post sources familiar with the matter. The short-term goal is to deliver a data privacy proposal -- including how data should be collected and handled and what rights consumers have regarding that data -- which could serve as a guide for lawmakers as they consider legislation.

Axios reported last month that the White House was looking into a data privacy plan, meeting with groups like the Information Technology Industry Council, a trade group representing companies such as Apple, Google and Facebook, and The Business Roundtable, a lobbying group that hosts tech CEOs like Apple's Tim Cook, IBM's Virginia Rometty and Verizon's Lowell McAdam.

"Through the White House National Economic Council, the Trump Administration aims to craft a consumer privacy protection policy that is the appropriate balance between privacy and prosperity," Lindsay Walters, the president's deputy press secretary, told the Washington Post. "We look forward to working with Congress on a legislative solution consistent with our overarching policy."

The draft proposal also asks Congress to devise a law that would preempt any state laws, notable as California has just passed its own set of data privacy regulations. Vermont has taken on data privacy through legislation as well.

The White House is reportedly working to have its data privacy plan set this fall. Meanwhile, multiple lawmakers have now introduced their own data privacy bills in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Source: https://www.engadget.com/2018/07/27/white-house-federal-data-privacy-policy/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 29 2018, @01:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 29 2018, @01:37PM (#714344)

    Please, learn from EU's mistakes!
    I'm from an EU country. First, we introduced a famous "cookie directive" - all sites which use cookies in any form must inform it using a panel on a site.
    So if the site uses cookies in some subpage in the devil's arse only for logged-in users who meet some specific criteria, they must inform all users with collapsible window and... guess what, use cookies even more to record if user accepted it or not!
    Next, the GDPR. This is a defective thing made by companies. For example, to decide about personal data transfer some services, you have to slide through 500+ partners list, uncheck each of them and solve G's captcha for each. Or just accept a "special" terms, which are so vague that for e.g. e-mail you instantly become a GPG-evangelist :).
    Add hordes of law offices who send threats and blackmail "we will sue you if you don't pay" as it's always easy to point real or virtual violation of vague terms, and suddenly smaller services who can't afford an army of lawyers are gone.
    And don't tell me about paying with ads, it's another myth. In most bloated sites you pay BY viewing ads, but you pay FOR viewing ads, nothing more. The quality of content is now very poor (where's my refund?), and technical costs are eating its own tail, inflating with adding more ads which must be served from somewhere.