Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Trump Administration Expected to Propose Limiting Citizenship for Legal Immigrants

posted by martyb on Thursday August 16 2018, @09:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the What-would-Emma-Lazarus-say? dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes:

CBS News reports:

The Trump administration is expected to issue a proposal in coming weeks that would make it harder for legal immigrants to become citizens or get green cards if they have ever used a range of popular public welfare programs, including Obamacare, four sources with knowledge of the plan told NBC News.

The move, which would not need congressional approval, is part of White House senior adviser Stephen Miller's plan to limit the number of migrants who obtain legal status in the U.S. each year.

[...] Though its effects could be far-reaching, the proposal to limit citizenship to immigrants who have not used public assistance does not appear to need congressional approval. As the Clinton administration did in 1999, the Trump administration would be redefining the term "public charge," which first emerged in immigration law in the 1800s in order to shield the U.S. from burdening too many immigrants who could not contribute to society.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Trump Administration Expected to Propose Limiting Citizenship for Legal Immigrants | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 214 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday August 16 2018, @05:37PM (5 children)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday August 16 2018, @05:37PM (#722362) Homepage Journal

    ...retroactively plug the loopholes in your tax system and make those multi-nationals pay back all the taxes they moved into fiscal paradises.

    Sounds good to me but it'll never get through all the bought-and-paid-for politicians.

    As for the rest, I see where you misunderstood. You neglected to consider legal immigrants who do not ever go on welfare at all. Those plus the ones who abuse it make the ones who use it as intended very much an edge case.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 16 2018, @06:09PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 16 2018, @06:09PM (#722386)

    WOW!

    Nice weasel twisting you did there, for someone who always calls for facts when it is convenient you sure do have a lot of unsupported ASSumptions you pretend are facts.

    You're a dishonest hypocritical asshole and this site is stained by your presence, even with your code contributions.

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday August 16 2018, @06:38PM (3 children)

    by c0lo (156) on Thursday August 16 2018, @06:38PM (#722413) Journal

    ...retroactively plug the loopholes in your tax system and make those multi-nationals pay back all the taxes they moved into fiscal paradises.

    Sounds good to me but it'll never get through all the bought-and-paid-for politicians.

    LOL, mate. We have yet chances to make a fine socialist from you.
    Half the way there already: you just admitted that "Other-People's-Money is a good thing™" as long as the people are multinational corporations. Only a bit more and we'll call you "comrade" in our attempt to throw those corrupt politicians out.
    (very large trollish grin)

    As for the rest, I see where you misunderstood. You neglected to consider legal immigrants who do not ever go on welfare at all. Those plus the ones who abuse it make the ones who use it as intended very much an edge case.

    Numbers, mate, numbers or it didn't happen.
    I'll put down these things:

    • you claimed "edge cases", yours be the burden to come with the numbers. It may be good for you too: what if those numbers so something different that you thought they'll be, can you live with the idea you could be wrong, even if only inadvertently wrong? (grin)
    • numbers and quantity vs quality - if you look at scientific articles coming out from the American research, you'll note a very significant proportion of authors with pure-breed American names like: Liu and Zhou and Wang.
      You sure you want to potentially eject any of them from US, now that China overtook America in the scientific papers [nature.com]?
      I can guarantee you the Chinese are very little interested in "social studies" (the party has all the answers in social, no further studies are necessary) and "nutrition/obesity" (not enough HFCS in China, they need corn to feed their stock), most of these papers will be in hard sciences.
    • my position is simple: if anyone played by the rules, it's only fair not to punish them because the rules were bad. I don't need to come with numbers, don't ask me for them
    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0