I don't want to say much about it, but I did want to say that I saw the message (thank you for that) and sympathise with the issue. Also wanted to direct you to my follow up comment to someone else [soylentnews.org] that I think better explains why it bothers me. I think the proposed solution is tone-deaf to the problem here, not because of being too soft, but because it's rewarding a "crime" of power and control by giving power and control to the wrongdoer even when being punished. I'm not going to bail on the site, but I'm still not a fan of the solution for that reason.
(Score: 2) by Marand on Friday February 04 2022, @07:41AM
I don't want to say much about it, but I did want to say that I saw the message (thank you for that) and sympathise with the issue. Also wanted to direct you to my follow up comment to someone else [soylentnews.org] that I think better explains why it bothers me. I think the proposed solution is tone-deaf to the problem here, not because of being too soft, but because it's rewarding a "crime" of power and control by giving power and control to the wrongdoer even when being punished. I'm not going to bail on the site, but I'm still not a fan of the solution for that reason.