Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday July 04 2014, @03:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the happy-workers dept.

The Center for American Progress reports:

Think a higher minimum wage is a job killer? Think again: The states that raised their minimum wages on January 1 have seen higher employment growth since then than the states that kept theirs at the same rate.

The minimum wage went up in 13 states Arizona, Connecticut, Colorado, Florida, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington either thanks to automatic increases in line with inflation or new legislation, as Ben Wolcott reports in his analysis at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. The average change in employment for those states over the first five months of the year as compared with the last five of 2013 is 0.99 percent, while the average for all remaining states is 0.68 percent.

Digging deeper, all but one of those states are experiencing increases in employment, and nine of them have seen growth above the median rate.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by choose another one on Friday July 04 2014, @08:53PM

    by choose another one (515) on Friday July 04 2014, @08:53PM (#64312)

    Three of the four states that passed legislation ended up at the bottom of the group of these 13 states by employment increase (with all three below the employment increase rate of the states which didn't increase minimum wage). The other nine states, which had automatic minimum wage increases fared far better

    Interestingly there is a plausible mechanism for that - decreasing uncertainty and risk.

    Increasing employment implies expansion and _investment_. Investment decisions are made (well, sometimes :-)) taking into account risk, and increasing cost of employees is a risk. If the increase is automatic, then the cost - although increased - is _known_ and a risk is eliminated, possibly increasing the chance of investment being made.

    On the other hand, even in the states that did not actually increase, there may have been a risk that they would - a risk that might postpone or dissuade investment.

    Of course, that is what happens when the economy is generally growing - in a recession or depression an automatic increase may work the other way and employers may cut back staff sooner because they _know_ that wage costs will increase.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2