Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday July 04 2014, @11:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the too-big-to-suffer-the-consequences dept.

Reuters reports:

Goldman Sachs Group Inc said a contractor emailed confidential client data to a stranger's Gmail account by mistake, and the bank has asked a U.S. judge to order Google Inc to delete the email to avert a "needless and massive" breach of privacy.

The breach occurred on June 23 and included "highly confidential brokerage account information," Goldman said in a complaint filed last Friday in a New York state court in Manhattan.

Ars Technica reports:

At the request of investment bank Goldman Sachs, Google has blocked access to a sensitive e-mail that the bank mistakenly sent to a random Gmail account. Google confirmed to Goldman Sachs that the e-mail had not yet been opened by the recipient, according to a report late Wednesday from Reuters.

The e-mail in question, filled with confidential brokerage account information, was accidentally sent to a gmail.com address instead of a gs.com address by a contractor on June 23. Goldman Sachs tried to contact the e-mail account holder and then got in touch with Google, which initially said it would not take action without a court order. Goldman Sachs then filed for such a court order in a New York state court.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by davester666 on Saturday July 05 2014, @06:09AM

    by davester666 (155) on Saturday July 05 2014, @06:09AM (#64448)

    The warrant hasn't been issued. Google has voluntarily decided that they will prevent the recipient from being able to retrieve it.

    Just like the postman will return to your house, remove it from your mailbox and then hide it at the local post office because the sender claims it was addressed incorrectly and had very sensitive contents.

    Totally normal and above board.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by anubi on Saturday July 05 2014, @09:38AM

    by anubi (2828) on Saturday July 05 2014, @09:38AM (#64480) Journal

    Dave:

    When I look again at it... you have a far better outlook.

    When I saw references to the bankers and their lawyers and one of them had their proverbial tit in the wringer, the first thing that came to my mind is "throw the book at 'em" - without much even considering what it was. Usually racial hatred starts up this way, but your reply made me recognize the same thing in myself.. albeit it wasn't a race I am subconsciously pissed off at - rather it is the bankers.

    I have seen them seem to get their way, no matter what, and I was almost in glee seeing them have their hour of despair, like many people caught up in their shenanigans have also had their hour ( actually quite a few hours ) of despair. Ultimately, with the help of Congress, only the bankers could print their way out of their grief and get their bonuses anyway.

    Well, anyway, that's the reason for the animosity, but as you illustrated to me with your reply, that animosity also leads to poor judgement on my part. I have got to get over stuff like that. I have also made some pretty poor choices at the polls due to my distrust and animosity toward anyone who seems friendly with the bankerboys.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]