Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Random thoughts about this Brave New World.

Journal by Gaaark

My daughter just went to a Drag(on) party (sp???):

literally a pre-wedding party for two guys (and there was a stage drag theater contest).
My questions (being an old guy trying to fit into a new world)

1. Is it husband and wife or husband and husband (wife and wife for lesbians)?
2. Why do people do drag? and why don't they dress that way all the time if they like doing it so much?
3. I knew a 'flaming homo' in Toronto (did not know him well enough to ask questions like this): why do some guys act straight and some so feminine to outright flaming in yo' face?

Will probably remember some other questions later... does anyone have a primer?

Honestly asking.... this is all new to the guy who grew up (small town) saying "Ha...you're a homo!" without really knowing what that meant (when told about a 'circle jerk' i wondered why a bunch of guys would want to do that while thinking about women, lol).

Let the flaming begin!

**A side thought:
In the future there WILL be sex bots:
.....there will also be 'child sex bots' (and will/can child sex bots be made illegal?)... thinking about this is kind of disturbing, but i know it IS coming, sooner or later.
    Will something like that take care of a pedo's needs or lead to something worse?

If you had a fully functioning sex-bot that looks/feels real with wonderful AI, would you consider never having a relationship (such as marriage) again or just stick with sex-bot?
If my wife died and i had a bot/AI that was acceptable, i might just stick with it, methinks.

Damn, my mind is going tonight!

 

Reply to: Re:Wrong approach

    (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 27 2018, @07:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 27 2018, @07:11PM (#727083)

    That's a bad analogy for a number of reasons

    No, it's exactly the same but let's go again. Somebody walks up to you in the street and starts a conversation before insisting you respond to their imaginary friend? You wouldn't want to be rude would you?

    You don't need to change your mental definition in order to be polite around others.

    What if my definition of myself includes not allowing others to manipulate me into telling lies on their behalf?

    This is about social interaction not beliefs

    In order to socially interact with others, I should dismiss my own beliefs while appeasing theirs? To be clear, we're discussing unwarranted insistence that one party in a social interaction defers to the self-identity or persona [wikipedia.org] of the other. That's not how healthy social interactions work, it contravenes the unwritten assumption of mutual respect.

Post Comment

Edit Comment You are not logged in. You can log in now using the convenient form below, or Create an Account, or post as Anonymous Coward.

Public Terminal

Anonymous Coward [ Create an Account ]

Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!


Score: 0 (Logged-in users start at Score: 1). Create an Account!

Allowed HTML
<b|i|p|br|a|ol|ul|li|dl|dt|dd|em|strong|tt|blockquote|div|ecode|quote|sup|sub|abbr|sarc|sarcasm|user|spoiler|del>

URLs
<URL:http://example.com/> will auto-link a URL

Important Stuff

  • Please try to keep posts on topic.
  • Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
  • Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
  • Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
  • Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
  • If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

If you are having a problem with accounts or comment posting, please yell for help.