The Telegraph reports:
BBC journalists are being sent on courses to stop them inviting so many cranks onto programmes to air 'marginal views'.
The BBC Trust on Thursday published a progress report into the corporation's science coverage which was criticised in 2012 for giving too much air-time to critics who oppose non-contentious issues.
The report found that there was still an 'over-rigid application of editorial guidelines on impartiality' which sought to give the 'other side' of the argument, even if that viewpoint was widely dismissed.
(Score: 2) by theluggage on Wednesday July 09 2014, @06:01PM
You may have just heard a loud 'whooshing' noise. Sorry, I always forget to use the the irony tags.
Clue 1: who owned the paper at the centre of the story?
Clue 2: who owns those 'other sources' that I mentioned?
Name two (cases in which the deposed CEO was locked up for kiddy fiddling or was last seen heading for the Bahamas with the pension fund don't count).
(Score: 1) by Jiro on Wednesday July 09 2014, @09:04PM
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304203304576448291349364376 [wsj.com] (Dow Jones publishes the Wall Street Journal)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/business/media/jill-abramson-being-replaced-as-top-editor-at-times.html?_r=0 [nytimes.com]