SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Bug bounty alert: Musk lets pro hackers torpedo Tesla firmware risk free
Carmaker won't void warranties, fling sueballs at pros seeking security vulnerability rewards
[...] Tesla will allow vetted security researchers to hunt for vulnerabilities in its vehicle firmware risk free – as long as it is done under its bug bounty program.
The luxury electric automaker said this week it will reflash the firmware on cars that have been bricked by infosec bods probing for exploitable bugs in its code, provided they have suitably enrolled in the Elon Musk-run biz's bounty program. And any sanctioned searching can be carried out with worrying about being sued by Tesla's legal eagles.
"If, through your good-faith security research, you (a pre-approved, good-faith security researcher) cause a software issue that requires your research-registered vehicle to be updated or 'reflashed,' as an act of goodwill, Tesla shall make reasonable efforts to update or 'reflash' Tesla software on the research-registered vehicle by over-the-air update, offering assistance at a service center to restore the vehicle's software using our standard service tools, or other actions we deem appropriate," Tesla's updated security policy now reads.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by requerdanos on Friday September 07 2018, @02:53PM (1 child)
Just as with the "Tesla Does Not Give A Rat's Red Rear End About Complying With Software Licensing Stories", the resolution for this one is also:
"TESLA SUCKS SLIGHTLY LESS BUT STILL SUCKS HARD".
(The outcome of the software licensing problems [linux.com] was that Tesla, instead of refusing to provide any source code to comply with the licenses of the free software they had appropriated and modified, started to provide some source code, while still carefully and deliberately failing to comply with the licenses involved, while boldly and falsely declaring that they were "MAKING THE SOURCE CODE AVAILABLE." The outcome here is that instead of going to war with security researchers, they are declining for the moment to attack (only) their pet researchers, while still at war with the majority of security researchers, while boldly and falsely declaring "TOTALLY NOT MAKING WAR ON SECURITY RESEARCHERS".)
Tesla is a malicious DRM delivery company that uses 3G/4G networked cars to deliver its DRM. (The Tesla fans here argue with this; I expect to see some of that below. But they argue around it--not against it--because all of us are working with the same set of Tesla-Owns-U facts.)
(Score: 2) by MostCynical on Friday September 07 2018, @09:45PM
There is a fundamental issue with vehicles (cars, boats, aeroplanes..)
Once they can be modified, things can go wrong.
You local motor vehicle inspection can see that you haven't bolted your 454 into your 1960 Chev properly, or you brakes are not working.
Once you get to modified code (in frimware, or where ever) no one from local mechanic to the inspectors to the manufacturer will be a bly to certify that your changes are safe.
They can't even do that with any vehicle, now, but insurance and things like ATSB help "correct" things when they go wrong.
Even if Tesla released all the code, (because "license") there is an arguement that bad actors will find exploits and use them, rather than let the company/world know.
As Boeing or Airbus to release the code of a modern jet.
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex